Performance Assessment of ECG Delineators on Single-Lead Wearable Ambulatory Data

Abstract

Reliable interpretation of electrocardiograms (ECGs) requires precise identification of P, QRS, and T (PQRST) wave boundaries. However, it remains challenging due to noise, signal quality variability, and inherent morphological diversity particularly in recordings from children. This study systematically compares the performance of leading deep neural networks (DNN) and heuristic-based delineation algorithms on ambulatory single-lead ECG signals focusing on temporal accuracy. Experiments were conducted using the publicly available LUDB dataset and a private validation dataset comprising 21,759 annotated single-lead wave segments from 611 children recorded using KardiaMobile ECG sensor. DNN were first trained on the LUDB dataset and subsequently tested on the validation dataset. The delineation performance was assessed using Sensitivity (Se) and positive-predictive-value (P+) metrics. The best-performing heuristic based and DNN models reached Se and P+ of (98.9% vs 97.9%) for P, (99.8% vs 99.2%) for QRS, and (98.7% vs 95.9%) for T wave fiducials, respectively. The lowest standard-deviation (in ms) of wave onset/offset delineation was achieved by attention based 1DU-Net model; ±16.6/±16.3 for P-wave, ±14.0/±16.3 for QRS, and ±26.3/±18.8 for T-wave, respectively. The findings indicate that optimized heuristic models can perform comparably to complex DNN, highlighting their efficiency and suitability for real-time ECG delineation in digital health monitoring applications.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The study is funded by KU Leuven, center for affordable healthcare with funding reference REF23123123.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committees of the UZ Leuven with reference No. B3222022001075, Soddo christian hospital No. SCH1941015.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

Comments (0)

No login
gif