Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: A single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10(9):1199–1210 discussion 1210–1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2006.08.018

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cameron JL, He J (2015) Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg 220(4):530–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.031

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Allen PJ, Kuk D, Castillo CFD et al (2017) Multi-institutional validation study of the American joint commission on cancer (8th Edition) changes for T and N staging in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 265(1):185–191. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001763

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161(3):584–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Abu Hilal M et al (2017) Worldwide survey on opinions and use of minimally invasive pancreatic resection. HPB (Oxford) 19(3):190–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.011

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pfister M, Probst P, Müller PC et al (2023) Minimally invasive versus open pancreatic surgery: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. BJS Open 7(2):zrad007. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad007

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dokmak S, Ftériche FS, Aussilhou B et al (2015) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy should not be routine for resection of periampullary tumors. J Am Coll Surg 220(5):831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.052

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Palanivelu C, Senthilnathan P, Sabnis SC et al (2017) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours. Br J Surg 104(11):1443–1450. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10662

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Zureikat AH, Postlewait LM, Liu Y et al (2016) A multi-institutional comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 264(4):640–649. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001869

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME et al (2015) Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve. JAMA Surg 150(5):416–422. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.17

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Joseph N, Varghese C, Lucocq J et al (2024) Network meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing robotic, laparoscopic, and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Open 5(4):e507. https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000507

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

NMA. PRISMA statement. Accessed October 19 (2025) https://www.prisma-statement.org/nma

RoB 2: A revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials | Cochrane Bias. Accessed January 11 (2026) https://methods.cochrane.org/bias/resources/rob-2-revised-cochrane-risk-bias-tool-randomized-trials

GRADE | Cochrane. Accessed January 11 (2026) https://www.cochrane.org/learn/courses-and-resources/cochrane-methodology/grade

Bhingare P, Wankhade S, Gupta BB, Dakhore S (2019) A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic versus open whipple’s procedure for periampullary malignancy. Int Surg J 6(3):679–685. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20190814

Article  Google Scholar 

Liu Q, Li M, Gao Y et al (2024) Effect of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy on postoperative length of hospital stay and complications for pancreatic head or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 9(5):428–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00005-0

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Wang M, Pan S, Qin T et al (2023) Short-Term outcomes following laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 158(12):1245–1253. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2023.5210

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Poves I, Burdío F, Morató O et al (2018) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open approach for pancreatoduodenectomy: the PADULAP randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 268(5):731–739. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002893

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Klotz R, Mihaljevic AL, Kulu Y et al (2024) Robotic versus open partial pancreatoduodenectomy (EUROPA): a randomised controlled stage 2b trial. The Lancet Regional Health - Europe 39:100864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100864

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wang M, Li D, Chen R et al (2021) Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology 6(6):438–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00054-6

Article  Google Scholar 

van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Bosscha K et al (2019) Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(3):199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30004-4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yoon YS, Lee W, Kang CM et al (2024) Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Surg 110(11):7011–7019. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002035

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kamarajah SK, Bundred J, Marc OS et al (2020) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 46(1):6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.08.007

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ouyang L, Zhang J, Feng Q, Zhang Z, Ma H, Zhang G (2022) Robotic versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: an up-to-date system review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.834382

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chen R, Xiao C, Song S, Zhu L, Zhang T, Liu R (2024) The optimal choice for patients underwent minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis including patient subgroups. Surg Endosc 38(11):6237–6253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11289-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jamjoum G, Altoukhi SM, Alsulaimani MS et al (2025) Robotic vs laparoscopic approaches of pancreatic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg 19(1):295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02446-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kossenas K, Kouzeiha R, Moutzouri O, Georgopoulos F (2025) Comparing the operative, oncological, post-operative outcomes and complications of robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for the treatment of pancreatic and periampullary cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis with subgroup analysis. J Robot Surg 19(1):97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02239-y

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu F, Zou Y, Chen Q et al (2025) Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy provides better short-term outcomes as compared to its laparoscopic counterpart: a meta-analysis. Front Oncol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1568957

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tang G, Chen F, Chen R, Zhou R, Zhang J (2024) Robotic versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary tumors: a meta-analysis. Front Oncol 14:1486504. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1486504

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zhang J, Chen F, Tang G, Chen R, Zhou R (2025) Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12163-9

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Aiolfi A, Lombardo F, Bonitta G, Danelli P, Bona D (2021) Systematic review and updated network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Updates Surg 73(3):909–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00916-1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lancellotti F, Patel A, Coletta D et al (2024) Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism when compared to the open approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 50(7):108314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108314