Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y et al (2022) European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: the 2022 update. Eur Urol 82:399–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.006

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bigot P, Barthelemy P, Boissier R et al (2022) French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022–2024: management of kidney cancer. Prog Urol 32:1195–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2022.07.146

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

George AK, Herati AS, Rais-Bahrami S et al (2014) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors: oncologic and renal functional outcomes. Urology 83:111–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.08.059

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim SP, Campbell SC, Gill I et al (2017) Collaborative review of risk benefit trade-offs between partial and radical nephrectomy in the management of anatomically complex renal masses. Eur Urol 72:64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.038

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hemal AK, Kumar A, Kumar R et al (2007) Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison. J Urol 177:862–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.053

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR et al (2007) Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 178:41–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.038

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wallis CJ, Garbens A, Chopra S et al (2017) Robotic partial nephrectomy: expanding utilization, advancing innovation. J Endourol 31:348–54. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0639

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Miyake H, Hinata N, Imai S et al (2015) Partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors: comparison of conventional open and robot-assisted approaches. Int J Clin Oncol 20:808–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-015-0783-x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sagalovich D, Dagenais J, Bertolo R et al (2018) Trifecta outcomes in renal hilar tumors: a comparison between robotic and open partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 32:831–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0445

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg 88:105906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC et al (2011) The Cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ et al (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557. 327:557 – 60

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Muraoka K, Takeya D, Nishimura K et al (2025) Evaluation of complication, renal function, and recurrence-free survival in hilar and non-hilar tumors during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis. Int J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.70156

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sarkis J, Champy CM, Doumerc N et al (2024) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for hilar and nonhilar renal masses: comparison of perioperative, oncological, and functional results in a multicentre prospective cohort (NEPRAH Study, UroCCR 175). Eur Urol Oncol 7:1487–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.06.003

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tyagi S, Sharma G, Bora GS et al (2021) Trifecta and pentafecta outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for hilar versus nonhilar tumors: a propensity-matched analysis. Indian J Urol 37:318–24. https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_136_21

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Liu T, Zhao Z, Feng B et al (2021) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic tumor enucleation is a feasible technique for renal hilar tumors: a retrospective study. J Surg Oncol 124:135–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26479

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Sunaryo PL, Paulucci DJ, Okhawere K et al (2020) A multi-institutional analysis of 263 hilar tumors during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. J Robot Surg 14:585–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-01028-8

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lu SY, Chung HJ, Huang EY et al (2018) The perioperative outcomes between renal hilar and non-hilar tumors following robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). J Chin Med Assoc 81:676–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2017.11.014

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Eyraud R, Long JA, Snow-Lisy D et al (2013) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors: perioperative outcomes. Urology 81:1246–1251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.072

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dulabon LM, Kaouk JH, Haber GP et al (2011) Multi-institutional analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for hilar versus nonhilar lesions in 446 consecutive cases. Eur Urol 59:325–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.11.017

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Becker F, Van Poppel H, Hakenberg OW et al (2009) Assessing the impact of ischaemia time during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.016. :625 – 34

Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM et al (2010) Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 58:340–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.05.047

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zargar H, Akca O, Autorino R et al (2015) Ipsilateral renal function preservation after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN): an objective analysis using mercapto-acetyltriglycine (MAG3) renal scan data and volumetric assessment. BJU Int 115:787–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12825

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bossuyt PM, Deeks JJ, Leeflang MM et al (2023) Evaluating medical tests: introducing the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (7):Ed000163. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.Ed000163

Article  Google Scholar 

Li KP, Chen SY, Wang CY et al (2023) Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally-invasive surgery for renal cell carcinoma with venous tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative trials. Int J Surg 109:2762–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000000405

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Leow JJ, Heah NH, Chang SL et al (2016) Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: an updated meta-analysis of 4,919 patients. J Urol 196:1371–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.011

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Di Maida F, Grosso AA, Campi R et al (2023) Redo partial nephrectomy for local recurrence after previous nephron-sparing surgery. Surgical insights and oncologic results from a high-volume robotic center. Eur Urol Open Sci 57:84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2023.09.007

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Volpe A, Blute ML, Ficarra V et al (2015) Renal ischemia and function after partial nephrectomy: a collaborative review of the literature. Eur Urol 68:61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.025

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Peyronnet B, Tondut L, Bernhard JC et al (2018) Impact of hospital volume and surgeon volume on robot-assisted partial nephrectomy outcomes: a multicentre study. BJU Int 121:916–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14175

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Patton MW, Salevitz DA, Tyson MD et al (2016) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal masses. J Robot Surg 10:2