Anjana RM, Unnikrishnan R, Deepa M, et al. Metabolic non-communicable disease health report of India: the ICMR-INDIAB national cross-sectional study (ICMR-INDIAB-17). Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023;11:474–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(23)00119-5.
Azeez O. Hypertension and diabetes in non-pregnant women of reproductive age in the United States. Prev Chronic Dis. 2019. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd16.190105.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kobayashi G, Shinozaki T, Okada H, et al. Associations between anthropometric indices as complementary predictors and incidence of type 2 diabetes; Panasonic cohort study 21. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2024;217:111888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111888.
Skogberg N, Laatikainen T, Lundqvist A, Lilja E, Härkänen T, Koponen P. Which anthropometric measures best indicate type 2 diabetes among Russian, Somali and Kurdish origin migrants in Finland? A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e019166. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019166.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mahawar KK. Body mass index: is it relevant for Indians? Apollo Medicine. 2014;11:157–60.
Prasad D, Kabir Z, Suganthy J, Dash A, Das B. Appropriate anthropometric indices to identify cardiometabolic risk in south Asians. WHO South-East Asia J Public Health. 2013;2:142. https://doi.org/10.4103/2224-3151.206760.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Jayawardana R, Ranasinghe P, Sheriff MHR, Matthews DR, Katulanda P. Waist to height ratio: a better anthropometric marker of diabetes and cardio-metabolic risks in South Asian adults. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013;99:292–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2012.12.013.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Antonini-Canterin F, Di Nora C, Poli S, Sparacino L, Cosei I, Ravasel A, et al. Obesity, cardiac remodeling, and metabolic profile: validation of a new simple index beyond body mass index. J Cardiovasc Echography. 2018;28:18. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_63_17.
Venkatrao M, Nagarathna R, Patil SS, Singh A, Rajesh SK, Nagendra H. A composite of BMI and waist circumference may be a better obesity metric in Indians with high risk for type 2 diabetes: an analysis of NMB-2017, a nationwide cross-sectional study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020;161:108037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108037.
Wang N, Li Y, Guo C. Waist-corrected BMI predicts incident diabetes mellitus in a population-based observational cohort study. Front Endocrinol. 2023;14:1186702.
Morgenstern JD, Buajitti E, O’Neill M, Piggott T, Goel V, Fridman D, et al. Predicting population health with machine learning: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e037860. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037860.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Samuel AL. Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM J Res Dev. 1959;3:210–29. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.33.0210.
Chaki J, Thillai Ganesh S, Cidham SK, Ananda Theertan S. Machine learning and artificial intelligence based diabetes mellitus detection and self-management: a systematic review. J King Saud Univ - Comput Inform Sci. 2022;34:3204–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.06.013.
Islam MdM, Rahman MdJ, Chandra Roy D, Maniruzzaman Md. Automated detection and classification of diabetes disease based on Bangladesh demographic and health survey data, 2011 using machine learning approach. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14:217–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.03.004.
Thotad PN, Bharamagoudar GR, Anami BS. Diabetes disease detection and classification on Indian demographic and health survey data using machine learning methods. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2023;17:102690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2022.102690.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Kallur S, Yaligar S, Thotad PN. Boosting-based machine learning approaches for diabetes prediction using Indian demographic and health survey data. In: 2024 IEEE North Karnataka subsection flagship international conference (NKCon). 2024. p. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/NKCon62728.2024.10774905.
Sharma T, Shah M. A comprehensive review of machine learning techniques on diabetes detection. Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art. 2021;4:30.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sadeghi S, Khalili D, Ramezankhani A, Mansournia MA, Parsaeian M. Diabetes mellitus risk prediction in the presence of class imbalance using flexible machine learning methods. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022;22:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01775-z.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Greenwood CJ, Youssef GJ, Letcher P, et al. A comparison of penalised regression methods for informing the selection of predictive markers. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0242730. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242730.
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate hyperglycaemia: report of a WHO/IDF consultation. International Diabetes Federation; 2006. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/43588.
Quinlan JR. Induction of decision trees. Mach Learn. 1986;1:81–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116251.
Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45:5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.
Chen T, Guestrin C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data Mining. 2016. p. 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785.
Hoerl AE, Kennard RW. Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics. 1970;12:55–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634.
Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Soft. 2010. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i01.
Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 1996;58:267–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x.
Zou H, Hastie T. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 2005;67:301–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x.
Ozenne B, Subtil F, Maucort-Boulch D. The precision–recall curve overcame the optimism of the receiver operating characteristic curve in rare diseases. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:855–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.02.010.
Chen W, Miao C, Zhang Z, et al. Commonly used software tools produce conflicting and overly optimistic AUPRC values. Genome Biol. 2024;25:118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-024-03266-y.
Comments (0)