Asao, K., Khera, P., & Vasishth, M. (2024). Why such few women in leadership positions in Japan? IMF Selected Issues Paper (SIP/2024/024). International Monetary Fund. Retrieved June 20, 2025 from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/selected-issues-papers/Issues/2024/07/01/Why-Such-Few-Women-in-Leadership-Positions-in-Japan-Japan-551178

Azuma, K., & Suzuki, A. (1991). Review of research on sex role attitudes. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 62(4), 270–276. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.62.270

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baires, N. A., & Koch, D. S. (2020). The future is female (and behavior analysis): A behavioral account of sexism and how behavior analysis is simultaneously part of the problem and solution. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 13(1), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-019-00394-x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Barnes, D., & Roche, B. (1997). Relational frame theory and the experimental analysis of human sexuality. Applied And Preventive Psychology, 6(3), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-1849(97)80001-7

Article  Google Scholar 

Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Mcenteggart, C., & Harte, C. (2021). Back to the future with an up-dated version of RFT: More field than frame? Perspectivas em Análise do Comportamento, 12(1), 1–19. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.18761/PAC.2021.v12.RFT.03

Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Power, P., Hayden, E., Milne, R., & Stewart, I. (2006). Do you really know what you believe? Developing the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a direct measure of implicit beliefs. The Irish Psychologist, 32(7), 169–177.

Google Scholar 

Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., & Boles, S. (2010). A sketch of the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) and the relational elaboration and coherence (REC) model. The Psychological Record, 60(3), 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395726

Article  Google Scholar 

Barnes-Holmes, D., & Harte, C. (2022). The IRAP as a measure of implicit cognition: A case of Frankenstein’s monster. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 45(3), 559–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-022-00352-z

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayden, E., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Stewart, I. (2008). The implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) as a response-time and event-related-potentials methodology for testing natural verbal relations: A preliminary study. The Psychological Record, 58(4), 497–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395634

Article  Google Scholar 

Barnes-Holmes, D., Waldron, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Stewart, I. (2009). Testing the validity of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure and the Implicit Association Test: Measuring attitudes toward Dublin and country life in Ireland. The Psychological Record, 59, 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395671

Article  Google Scholar 

Bassi, M., Mateo Díaz, M., Blumberg, R. L., & Reynoso, A. (2018). Failing to notice? Uneven teachers’ attention to boys and girls in the classroom. IZA Journal of Labor Economics, 7(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40172-018-0069-4

Article  Google Scholar 

Basuil, D. A., Agarwal, A., Manegold, J. G., & Casper, W. J. (2025). Gender differences in perception of gender inequity in human resource management practices. Human Resource Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12588

Article  Google Scholar 

Bleeker, M. M., & Jacobs, J. E. (2004). Achievement in math and science: Do mothers’ beliefs matter 12 years later? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.97

Article  Google Scholar 

Boysen, G. A., Chicosky, R. L., Rose, F. R., & Delmore, E. E. (2022). Evidence for a gender stereotype about psychology and its effect on perceptions of men’s and women’s fit in the field. The Journal of Social Psychology, 162(4), 485–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2021.1921682

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal Of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301

Article  Google Scholar 

Cabrera, I., Márquez-González, M., Kishita, N., Vara-García, C., & Losada, A. (2021). Development and validation of an implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) to measure implicit dysfunctional beliefs about caregiving in dementia family caregivers. The Psychological Record, 71, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00445-8

Article  Google Scholar 

Cartwright, A., Hussey, I., Roche, B., Dunne, J., & Murphy, C. (2017). An investigation into the relationship between the gender binary and occupational discrimination using the implicit relational assessment procedure. The Psychological Record, 67(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0212-1

Article  Google Scholar 

Chattopadhyay, R., & Duflo, E. (2004). Women as policy makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica, 72(5), 1409–1443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00539.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Chung, J., & Monroe, G. S. (2003). Exploring social desirability bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023648703356

Article  Google Scholar 

Cundiff, J. L., & Vescio, T. K. (2016). Gender stereotypes influence how people explain gender disparities in the workplace. Sex Roles, 75(3), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0593-2

Article  Google Scholar 

Daumeyer, N. M., Onyeador, I. N., Brown, X., & Richeson, J. A. (2019). Consequences of attributing discrimination to implicit vs. explicit bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, Article 103812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.04.010

Article  Google Scholar 

Da Silva, J. C. R., de Almeida, R. V., & Bortoloti, R. (2024). Lesbian and heterosexual women’s implicit responses to gender figures. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 53, 3925–3943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-024-02972-9

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

De Gioannis, E. (2023). The conundrum of gender-science stereotypes: A review and discussion of measurements. Quality and Quantity, 57(4), 3165–3182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01512-8

Article  Google Scholar 

Drake, C. E., Primeaux, S., & Thomas, J. (2018). Comparing implicit gender stereotypes between women and men with the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure. Gender Issues, 35, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-017-9189-6

Article  Google Scholar 

Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Errasti, J., Martinez, H., Rodriguez, C., Marquez, J., Maldonado, A., & Menendez, A. (2019). Social context in a collective IRAP application about gender stereotypes: Mixed versus single-gender groups. The Psychological Record, 69(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0320-1

Article  Google Scholar 

Farrell, L., Cochrane, A., & McHugh, L. (2015). Exploring attitudes towards gender and science: The advantages of an IRAP approach versus the IAT. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2015.04.002

Article  Google Scholar 

Farrell, L., & McHugh, L. (2017). Examining gender-STEM bias among STEM and non-STEM students using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP). Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6(1), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.02.001

Article  Google Scholar 

Farrell, L., & McHugh, L. (2020). Exploring the relationship between implicit and explicit gender-STEM bias and behavior among STEM students using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure. Journal Of Contextual Behavioral Science, 15, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.12.008

Article  Google Scholar 

Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1086/209351

Article  Google Scholar 

Fleming, K., Foody, M., & Murphy, C. (2020). Using the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) to examine implicit gender stereotypes in science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM). The Psychological Record, 70(3), 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00401-6

Article  Google Scholar 

Froehlich, L., Tsukamoto, S., Morinaga, Y., Sakata, K., Uchida, Y., Keller, M. M., Stürmer, S., Martiny, S. E., & Trommsdorff, G. (2022). Gender stereotypes and expected backlash for female STEM students in Germany and Japan. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 793486. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.793486

Article  Google Scholar 

Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692–731. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gender Equality Bureau, Cabinet Office. (2024). White paper on gender equality 2024. https://www.gender.go.jp/about_danjo/whitepaper/r06/zentai/index.html

Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486–489. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Golijani-Moghaddam, N., Hart, A., & Dawson, D. L. (2013). The implicit relational assessment procedure: Emerging reliability and validity data. Journal Of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2(3–4), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2013.05.002

Article  Google Scholar 

Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar