Diagnostic approach for incidental pulmonary nodules

1. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Stat facts: lung and bronchus cancer. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute, 2022. 2. Detterbeck FC, Woodard GA, Bader AS, et al. The proposed ninth edition TNM classification of lung cancer. Chest 2024;166:882–895.
crossref pmid
3. Deslypere G, Gullentops D, Wauters E, Vansteenkiste J. Immunotherapy in non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: can the benefits of stage IV therapy be translated into earlier stages? Ther Adv Med Oncol 2018;10:1758835918772810.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
4. Zhong D, Sidorenkov G, Jacobs C, et al. Lung nodule management in low-dose CT screening for lung cancer: lessons from the NELSON trial. Radiology 2024;313:e240535.
crossref pmid
5. Ferrigno D, Buccheri G. Clinical applications of serum markers for lung cancer. Respir Med 1995;89:587–597.
crossref pmid
6. Manser R, Lethaby A, Irving LB, et al. Screening for lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;2013:CD001991.
crossref pmid pmc
7. Patz EF Jr, Campa MJ, Gottlin EB, et al. Biomarkers to help guide management of patients with pulmonary nodules. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;188:461–465.
crossref pmid
8. The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011;365:395–409.
crossref pmid pmc
9. MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM, et al. Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 2017;284:228–243.
crossref pmid
10. McWilliams A, Tammemagi MC, Mayo JR, et al. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N Engl J Med 2013;369:910–919.
crossref pmid pmc
11. Walter JE, Heuvelmans MA, de Jong PA, et al. Occurrence and lung cancer probability of new solid nodules at incidence screening with low-dose CT: analysis of data from the randomised, controlled NELSON trial. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:907–916.
crossref pmid
12. Ost D, Fein A. Management strategies for the solitary pulmonary nodule. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2004;10:272–278.
crossref pmid
13. Gohagan J, Marcus P, Fagerstrom R, Pinsky P, Kramer B, Prorok P, Writing Committee, Lung Screening Study Research Group. Baseline findings of a randomized feasibility trial of lung cancer screening with spiral CT scan vs chest radiograph: the Lung Screening Study of the National Cancer Institute. Chest 2004;126:114–121.
crossref pmid
14. Trunk G, Gracey DR, Byrd RB. The management and evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Chest 1974;66:236–239.
crossref pmid
15. Neifeld JP, Michaelis LL, Doppman JL. Suspected pulmonary metastases: correlation of chest x-ray, whole lung tomograms, and operative findings. Cancer 1977;39:383–387.
crossref pmid
16. Coultas DB, Samet JM. Occupational lung cancer. Clin Chest Med 1992;13:341–354.
crossref pmid
17. Swensen SJ, Silverstein MD, Ilstrup DM, Schleck CD, Edell ES. The probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules. Application to small radiologically indeterminate nodules. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:849–855.
crossref pmid
18. MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, et al.; Fleischner Society. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2005;237:395–400.
crossref pmid
19. Bankier AA, MacMahon H, Goo JM, Rubin GD, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Naidich DP. Recommendations for measuring pulmonary nodules at CT: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2017;285:584–600.
crossref pmid
20. Song YS, Park CM, Park SJ, Lee SM, Jeon YK, Goo JM. Volume and mass doubling times of persistent pulmonary subsolid nodules detected in patients without known malignancy. Radiology 2014;273:276–284.
crossref pmid
21. Swensen SJ, Viggiano RW, Midthun DE, et al. Lung nodule enhancement at CT: multicenter study. Radiology 2000;214:73–80.
crossref pmid
22. Gould MK, Donington J, Lynch WR, et al. Evaluation of individuals with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2013;143(5 Suppl):e93S–e120S.
crossref pmid pmc
23. Christensen J, Prosper AE, Wu CC, et al. ACR Lung-RADS v2022: assessment categories and management recommendations. J Am Coll Radiol 2024;21:473–488.
crossref pmid
24. Ahn Y, Lee SM, Noh HN, et al. Use of a commercially available deep learning algorithm to measure the solid portions of lung cancer manifesting as subsolid lesions at CT: comparisons with radiologists and invasive component size at pathologic examination. Radiology 2021;299:202–210.
crossref pmid
25. Kim H, Lee D, Cho WS, et al. CT-based deep learning model to differentiate invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas appearing as subsolid nodules among surgical candidates: comparison of the diagnostic performance with a size-based logistic model and radiologists. Eur Radiol 2020;30:3295–3305.
crossref pmid pdf
26. Zhang R, Wei Y, Wang D, et al. Deep learning for malignancy risk estimation of incidental sub-centimeter pulmonary nodules on CT images. Eur Radiol 2024;34:4218–4229.
crossref pmid pdf
27. Venkadesh KV, Aleef TA, Scholten ET, et al. Prior CT improves deep learning for malignancy risk estimation of screening-detected pulmonary nodules. Radiology 2023;308:e223308.
pmid
28. Deppen SA, Blume JD, Kensinger CD, et al. Accuracy of FDGPET to diagnose lung cancer in areas with infectious lung disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2014;312:1227–1236.
crossref pmid pmc
29. Nomori H, Watanabe K, Ohtsuka T, Naruke T, Suemasu K, Uno K. Evaluation of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scanning for pulmonary nodules less than 3 cm in diameter, with special reference to the CT images. Lung Cancer 2004;45:19–27.
crossref pmid
30. Lee SM, Park CM, Lee KH, Bahn YE, Kim JI, Goo JM. C-arm cone-beam CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of lung nodules: clinical experience in 1108 patients. Radiology 2014;271:291–300.
crossref pmid
31. Takeshita J, Masago K, Kato R, et al. CT-guided fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsies of pulmonary lesions: a single-center experience with 750 biopsies in Japan. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;204:29–34.
crossref pmid
32. Fontaine-Delaruelle C, Souquet PJ, Gamondes D, et al. Negative predictive value of transthoracic core-needle biopsy: a multicenter study. Chest 2015;148:472–480.
crossref pmid
33. Choi SH, Chae EJ, Kim JE, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided aspiration and core biopsy of pulmonary nodules smaller than 1 cm: analysis of outcomes of 305 procedures from a tertiary referral center. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:964–970.
crossref pmid
34. Chang YY, Chen CK, Yeh YC, Wu MH. Diagnostic feasibility and safety of CT-guided core biopsy for lung nodules less than or equal to 8 mm: a single-institution experience. Eur Radiol 2018;28:796–806.
crossref pmid pdf
35. Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. Population-based risk for complications after transthoracic needle lung biopsy of a pulmonary nodule: an analysis of discharge records. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:137–144.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
36. Dangers L, Giovannelli J, Mangiapan G, et al. Antiplatelet drugs and risk of bleeding after bedside pleural procedures: a national multicenter cohort study. Chest 2021;159:1621–1629.
crossref pmid
37. Ibukuro K, Tanaka R, Takeguchi T, Fukuda H, Abe S, Tobe K. Air embolism and needle track implantation complicating CT-guided percutaneous thoracic biopsy: single-institution experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:W430–W436.
crossref pmid
38. Tey AJ, Wong JJJ, Lim NF, Ho S. Systemic air embolism after image-guided percutaneous biopsy of the lung. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2024;210:e1–e2.
crossref pmc
39. Freund MC, Petersen J, Goder KC, Bunse T, Wiedermann F, Glodny B. Systemic air embolism during percutaneous core needle biopsy of the lung: frequency and risk factors. BMC Pulm Med 2012;12:2.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
40. Ost DE, Ernst A, Lei X, et al.; AQuIRE Bronchoscopy Registry. Diagnostic yield and complications of bronchoscopy for peripheral lung lesions. Results of the AQuIRE registry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;193:68–77.
crossref pmid pmc
41. Rivera MP, Mehta AC, Wahidi MM. Establishing the diagnosis of lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2013;143(5 Suppl):e142S–e165S.
crossref pmid
42. Ost D, Shah R, Anasco E, et al. A randomized trial of CT fluoroscopic-guided bronchoscopy vs conventional bronchoscopy in patients with suspected lung cancer. Chest 2008;134:507–513.
crossref pmid
43. Oki M, Saka H, Ando M, et al. Ultrathin bronchoscopy with multimodal devices for peripheral pulmonary lesions. A randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;192:468–476.
crossref pmid
44. Matsumoto Y, Nakai T, Tanaka M, Imabayashi T, Tsuchida T, Ohe Y. Diagnostic outcomes and safety of cryobiopsy added to conventional sampling methods: an observational study. Chest 2021;160:1890–1901.
crossref pmid
45. Kurimoto N, Morita K. Bronchial branch tracing. Singapore: Springer Nature, 2020. 46. Sainz Zuñiga PV, Vakil E, Molina S, Bassett RL Jr, Ost DE. Sensitivity of radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided bronchoscopy for lung cancer in patients with peripheral pulmonary lesions: an updated meta-analysis. Chest 2020;157:994–1011.
crossref pmid
47. Asano F, Eberhardt R, Herth FJ. Virtual bronchoscopic navigation for peripheral pulmonary lesions. Respiration 2014;88:430–440.
crossref pmid pdf
48. Nadig TR, Thomas N, Nietert PJ, et al. Guided bronchoscopy for the evaluation of pulmonary lesions: an updated meta-analysis. Chest 2023;163:1589–1598.
crossref pmid pmc
49. Ishida T, Asano F, Yamazaki K, et al.; Virtual Navigation in Japan Trial Group. Virtual bronchoscopic navigation combined with endobronchial ultrasound to diagnose small peripheral pulmonary lesions: a randomised trial. Thorax 2011;66:1072–1077.
crossref pmid
50. Asano F, Shinagawa N, Ishida T, et al. Virtual bronchoscopic navigation combined with ultrathin bronchoscopy. A randomized clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;188:327–333.
crossref pmid
51. Wang Memoli JS, Nietert PJ, Silvestri GA. Meta-analysis of guided bronchoscopy for the evaluation of the pulmonary nodule. Chest 2012;142:385–393.
crossref pmid
52. Gex G, Pralong JA, Combescure C, Seijo L, Rochat T, Soccal PM. Diagnostic yield and safety of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for lung nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respiration 2014;87:165–176.
crossref pmid pdf
53. Thiboutot J, Pastis NJ, Akulian J, et al. A multicenter, single-arm, prospective trial assessing the diagnostic yield of electromagnetic bronchoscopic and transthoracic navigation for peripheral pulmonary nodules. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2023;208:837–845.
crossref pmid
54. Eberhardt R, Anantham D, Ernst A, Feller-Kopman D, Herth F. Multimodality bronchoscopic diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;176:36–41.
crossref pmid
55. Folch EE, Pritchett MA, Nead MA, et al.; NAVIGATE Study Investigators. Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: one-year results of the prospective, multicenter NAVIGATE study. J Thorac Oncol 2019;14:445–458.
pmid
56. Folch EE, Bowling MR, Pritchett MA, et al.; NAVIGATE Study Investigators. NAVIGATE 24-month results: electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for pulmonary lesions at 37 centers in Europe and the United States. J Thorac Oncol 2022;17:519–531.
crossref pmid
57. Chaddha U, Kovacs SP, Manley C, et al. Robot-assisted bronchoscopy for pulmonary lesion diagnosis: results from the initial multicenter experience. BMC Pulm Med 2019;19:243.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
58. Chen AC, Pastis NJ Jr, Mahajan AK, et al. Robotic bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: a multicenter pilot and feasibility study (BENEFIT). Chest 2021;159:845–852.
crossref pmid
59. Kalchiem-Dekel O, Connolly JG, Lin IH, et al. Shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of pulmonary parenchymal lesions. Chest 2022;161:572–582.
crossref pmid
60. Ost D, Pritchett M, Reisenauer J, et al. Prospective multicenter analysis of shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy for the biopsy of pulmonary nodules: results from the PRECIsE study. Chest 2021;160(4):A2531–A2533.
crossref
61. Saghaie T, Williamson JP, Phillips M, et al. First-in-human use of a new robotic electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopic platform with integrated Tool-in-Lesion Tomosynthesis (TiLT) technology for peripheral pulmonary lesions: the FRONTIER study. Respirology 2024;29:969–975.
crossref pmid
62. Harzheim D, Sterman D, Shah PL, Eberhardt R, Herth FJ. Bronchoscopic transparenchymal nodule access: feasibility and safety in an endoscopic unit. Respiration 2016;91:302–306.
crossref pmid pdf
63. Kodama K, Higashiyama M, Okami J, et al. Oncologic outcomes of segmentectomy versus lobectomy for clinical T1a N0 M0 non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;101:504–511.
crossref pmid
64. El-Sherif A, Gooding WE, Santos R, et al. Outcomes of sublobar resection versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a 13-year analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:408–415discussion 415–416.
crossref pmid
65. Allen MS, Deschamps C, Lee RE, Trastek VF, Daly RC, Pairolero PC. Video-assisted thoracoscopic stapled wedge excision for indeterminate pulmonary nodules. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:1048–1052.
crossref pmid
66. Bernard A. Resection of pulmonary nodules using video-assisted thoracic surgery. The Thorax Group. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:202–204discussion 204–205.
pmid
67. Park CH, Han K, Hur J, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of preoperative lung localization for pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest 2017;151:316–328.
crossref pmid
68. Sharma A, McDermott S, Mathisen DJ, Shepard JO. Preoperative localization of lung nodules with fiducial markers: feasibility and technical considerations. Ann Thorac Surg 2017;103:1114–1120.
crossref pmid
69. Shennib H. Intraoperative localization techniques for pulmonary nodules. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:745–748.
crossref pmid
70. Park D. Advanced bronchoscopic diagnostic techniques in lung cancer. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2024;87:282–291.
crossref pmid pmc pdf

Comments (0)

No login
gif