Pizzol D, Demurtas J, Celotto S, Maggi S, Smith L, Angiolelli G, et al. Urinary incontinence and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021;33(1):25–35.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Trost L, Elliott DS. Male stress urinary incontinence: a review of surgical treatment options and outcomes. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:287489.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Markland AD, Richter HE, Fwu CW, Eggers P, Kusek JW. Prevalence and trends of urinary incontinence in adults in the united states, 2001 to 2008. J Urol. 2011;186(2):589–93.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Anger JT, Saigal CS, Stothers L, Thom DH, Rodríguez LV, Litwin MS. The prevalence of urinary incontinence among community dwelling men: results from the National health and nutrition examination survey. J Urol. 2006;176(5):2103–8. discussion 8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cordon BH, Singla N, Singla AK. Artificial urinary sphincters for male stress urinary incontinence: current perspectives. Med Devices (Auckl). 2016;9:175–83.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moore KC, Lucas MG. Management of male urinary incontinence. Indian J Urol. 2010;26(2):236–44.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

B. S. Celebrating 50 years of AUS, 250,000 devices sold and AMS 800 - The Gold Standard 2022. Available from: https://www.bostonscientific.com/en-US/medical-specialties/urology/products/sui-surgical-options.html

Foley FE. An artificial sphincter; a new device and operation for control of enuresis and urinary incontinence. J Urol. 1947;58(4):250–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Carson CC. Artificial urinary sphincter: current status and future directions. Asian J Androl. 2020;22(2):154–7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chung E, Ranaweera M, Cartmill R. Newer and novel artificial urinary sphincters (AUS): the development of alternatives to the current AUS device. BJU Int. 2012;110(Suppl 4):5–11.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ricapito A, Rubino M, Annese P, Mancini V, Falagario U, Cormio L et al. Urinary artificial sphincter in male stress urinary incontinence: where are we today?? A narrative review. Uro [Internet]. 2023; 3(3):[229– 38 pp.].

Smith LJ, Bose SM. Historical perspective on the artificial urinary sphincter. Int J Reconstr Urol. 2024;2(2):128–33.

Article  Google Scholar 

Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Treatment of urinary incontinence by implantable prosthetic sphincter. Urology. 1973;1(3):252–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Montague DK. The Scott-bradley-timm artificial urinary sphincters. J Urol. 1981;125(6):796–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Montague DK. Evolution of implanted devices for urinary incontinence. Cleve Clin Q. 1984;51(2):405–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bruskewitz R, Raz S, Smith RB, Kaufman JJ. AMS 742 sphincter: UCLA experience. J Urol. 1980;124(6):812–4.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Motley RC, Barrett DM. Artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion. Experience with reimplantation in 38 patients. Urology. 1990;35(3):215–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Light JK, Reynolds JC. Impact of the new cuff design on reliability of the AS800 artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol. 1992;147(3):609–11.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chung E. Narrative review: evolution in device technology and advances in surgical techniques on AMS 800 device in the last 50 years. Transl Androl Urol. 2024;13(8):1657–65.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Litwiller SE, Kim KB, Fone PD, White RW, Stone AR. Post-prostatectomy incontinence and the artificial urinary sphincter: a long-term study of patient satisfaction and criteria for success. J Urol. 1996;156(6):1975–80.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elliott DS, Barrett DM. Mayo clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: a review of 323 cases. J Urol. 1998;159(4):1206–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hüsch T, Kretschmer A, Thomsen F, Kronlachner D, Kurosch M, Obaje A, et al. Antibiotic coating of the artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800): is it worthwhile?? Urology. 2017;103:179–84.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Linder BJ, Rivera ME, Ziegelmann MJ, Elliott DS. Long-term outcomes following artificial urinary sphincter placement: an analysis of 1082 cases at Mayo clinic. Urology. 2015;86(3):602–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

n der Aa F, Drake MJ, Kasyan GR, Petrolekas A, Cornu JN. Young academic urologists functional urology G. The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. Eur Urol. 2013;63(4):681–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Raj GV, Peterson AC, Toh KL, Webster GD. Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol. 2005;173(4):1242–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sandhu JS, Breyer B, Comiter C, Eastham JA, Gomez C, Kirages DJ, et al. Incontinence after prostate treatment: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2019;202(2):369–78.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Szczesniewski JJ, Díaz DE, Virseda-Chamorro M, Polisini G, Ammirati E, Giammò A. The history of prosthetic devices for postprostatectomy incontinence. Cont Rep. 2024;12:100063.

Google Scholar 

ZSI, Artificial Urinary Sphincter. ZSI 375 2019. Available from: https://www.zsimplants.ch/documents/zsi375/375-Patient-Selection-Manual-for-Urologists-BOOK.pdf

Staerman F, C GL, Leon P, Leclerc Y. ZSI 375 artificial urinary sphincter for male urinary incontinence: a preliminary study. BJU Int. 2013;111(4 Pt B):E202–6.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Basiri A, Dadpour M. A case report of the preferred indication for the zephyr (ZSI 375) artificial urinary sphincter. Urol Case Rep. 2022;43:102058.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bettocchi C, Ricapito A, Falagario U, Selvaggio O, Annese P, Mancini V, et al. ZSI-375 artificial urinary sphincter: efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2024;76(2):135–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ostrowski I, Ciechan J, Sledz E, Dys W, Golabek T, Chłosta PL. Four-year follow-up on a zephyr surgical implants 375 artificial urinary sphincter for male urinary incontinence from one urological centre in Poland. Cent Eur J Urol. 2018;71(3):320–5.

Google Scholar 

Ostrowski I, Śledź E, Wilamowski J, Józefczak M, Dyś W, Ciechan J, et al. Patients’ quality of life after implantation of ZSI 375 artificial urinary sphincter due to stress urinary incontinence. Cent Eur J Urol. 2020;73(2):178–86.

Google Scholar 

Ostrowski I, Blewniewski M, Neugart F, von Heyden B, Selvaggio O, Iori F, et al. Multicentre experience with ZSI 375 artificial urinary sphincter for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men. Urologia. 2017;84(3):148–52.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ameli G, Hüsch T, Hübner WA, Weibl P. A new adjustable artificial urinary sphincter for male stress urinary incontinence (Victo(TM)): preliminary clinical results. Transl Androl Urol. 2024;13(8):1546–54.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Weibl P, Hoelzel R, Rutkowski M, Huebner W. VICTO and VICTO-plus - novel alternative for the mangement of postprostatectomy incontinence. Early perioperative and postoperative experience. Cent Eur J Urol. 2018;71(2):248–9.

Google Scholar 

Krhut J, Bartáková L, Kondé A, Sýkora RP, Rychlý T, Zachoval R. Outcomes of the victo™ adjustable artificial urinary sphincter in the treatment of male incontinence. BJU Int. 2025;135(1):103–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Koca O, Güzel R, Kırkık D, Karaman M, Chung E. Rigicon conticlassic and contireflex artificial urinary sphincter devices. Transl Androl Urol. 2024;13(8):1762–6.

Article  PubMed