The latissimus dorsi tendon transfer (LDTT) to the supraspinatus tendon is a common procedure for restoring shoulder abduction and external rotation in upper root brachial plexus lesions. However, its association with scapular retraction often limits shoulder abduction.
MethodsThis retrospective study compared the functional outcomes of teres major tendon transfer (TMTT) combined with anterior coracohumeral ligament release (CHLR) versus LDTT. Patients who underwent surgery at our center between January 2012 and December 2022 were included, with a mean follow-up of 38 months. Outcomes were assessed using a range of motion and the Mallet scale.
ResultsA total of 40 patients were included, with 20 undergoing TMTT with CHLR and 20 undergoing LDTT. The overall mean age was 3.9 years (range: 2.7–4.8), with mean ages of 3.4 years (range: 2.2–5.2) in the LDTT group and 4.1 years (range: 2.8–5.2) in the TMTT with the CHLR group. The TMTT with CHLR group achieved mean gains of +77 degrees in active abduction, +44 degrees in active external rotation, and +46 degrees in passive external rotation. In comparison, the LDTT group demonstrated gains of +46, +27, and +24 degrees, respectively, for the same parameters.
ConclusionTMTT combined with anterior CHLR significantly improves shoulder abduction and external rotation in patients with Brachial plexus birth injury, particularly those with internal rotation contractures. This technique offers superior functional outcomes compared to LDTT, suggesting a more effective therapeutic alternative.
Level of EvidenceIV, retrospective comparative study.
Keywords coracohumeral ligament - latissimus dorsi - brachial plexus birth injury - tendon transfer - teres major Publication HistoryReceived: 02 January 2025
Accepted: 21 May 2025
Article published online:
19 June 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Comments (0)