Changes in thoracic Cobb angle dynamics following Nuss procedure and bar removal in adult patients with pectus excavatum

Abstract

Background Pectus excavatum is associated with spinal abnormalities. The Nuss procedure is the standard surgical correction approach, though its effect on spinal alignment, especially the thoracic Cobb angle, remains unclear. This study examined changes in thoracic Cobb angle dynamics in 109 adult patients with pectus excavatum.

Methods Patients with pectus excavatum (109; 86 males and 23 females; mean age: 23.9 ± 5.29 years) who underwent the Nuss procedure and subsequent bar removal were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic and clinical data were collected, including serial thoracic Cobb angle measurements from posteroanterior chest radiographs preoperatively, 1 month, 3–6 months, and 1 year postoperatively, 1 day pre-bar removal, and 1 week post-bar removal. Subgroup analyses were stratified by sex, Haller index (≥ or <4), bar number (1, 2, or 3) and position (oblique vs. horizontal), bar flipping within 3 months, and preoperative Cobb angle (< or ≥10°).

Results Mean thoracic Cobb angle significantly increased 1 month postoperatively (preoperative: 5.35±4.80° vs. 1 month postoperative: 5.75±5.00°, P=0.004), but significantly decreased 1 day before bar removal (preoperative: 5.35±4.80° vs. 1 day pre-bar removal: 4.90±4.74°, P=0.006) and 1 week after (preoperative: 5.35±4.80° vs. 1 week post-bar removal: 4.26±4.72°, P<0.001). Cobb angle significantly improved after bar removal.

Conclusions In adult patients with pectus excavatum, the Nuss procedure induced a transient increase in thoracic Cobb angle 1 month postoperatively, followed by a significant reduction after bar removal. Early bar flipping correlated with diminished Cobb angle correction.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding Statement

Yes

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee of Taipei Tzu-Chi Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (IRB No: 14-IRB012). The need for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the research.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Comments (0)

No login
gif