Sex differences in 277,168 arterial vascular surgical procedures: an 18-year comprehensive analysis of the Brazilian public health system

Abstract

Background Sex-based disparities in the presentation and outcomes of arterial vascular procedures are well-documented in high-income countries. However, comprehensive analyses within low- and middle-income healthcare systems, such as Brazil’s, are lacking. This study aimed to investigate these disparities using nationwide data from the Brazilian public health system.

Methods A retrospective, nationwide analysis was conducted using data from the DATASUS repository from 2007 to 2024. It included 277,168 hospitalizations for 22 arterial vascular surgical procedures. Outcomes assessed included patient demographics, procedure frequency, age at intervention, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and the need for intercity or interstate travel for care.

Results Among 277,168 procedures, men underwent 60% of all interventions. Women were significantly older at the time of peripheral arterial interventions, while men were older for aortic and carotid procedures. Women had significantly higher mortality rates in 8 out of 22 procedures, particularly in endovascular interventions (e.g., aortoiliac stenting and extremity angioplasty. Men demonstrated a greater need to travel for surgical care, with significant differences in 14 procedures for intercity travel, and only one procedure for interstate travel (difference of approximately 1%). Regional analysis revealed the Southeast as the primary hub for specialized care, receiving patients from all other regions.

Conclusion This 18-year comprehensive analysis reveals sex-based disparities in arterial vascular care within the Brazilian public health system. Men predominated in procedure volume and required more travel for care. Women presented at an older age for peripheral interventions and experienced higher mortality in specific procedures.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study used only openly available human data that were originally located at: DATASUS (https://datasus.saude.gov.br/acesso-a-informacao/producao-hospitalar-sih-sus/) DATASUS is an open administrative database from Brazil public healthcare system.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Comments (0)

No login
gif