Introduction Not providing breastfeeding reduce key nutrient that support child's optimal growth and immune boosting proteins component helps prevent a child from various disease, and consequently increases the risk of stunting. Studies showed inconsistency regarding breastfeeding statistical significant association with child stunting. Objective The initial aim of the systematic review and meta analysis was to synthesis the pooled effect size of researches on the impact of breastfeeding on stunting and the subsequent aim of the study was to evaluate the consistency of statistical significance. Method An International Prospective Register of Systemic Review received the prepared review protocol and registered it. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines were followed in the direction of this study. Two reviewers independently carried out the data extraction. An electronic bibliographic search was conducted using Google Scholar, PUB Med, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and the WHO journal. Using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Intervention tool, the study examines risk of bias.To evaluate the aggregate effect, the study used a random effect meta analysis approach. Cochran's Q and I2 statistics were used to evaluate statistical heterogeneity. In order to determine the cause of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis was conducted. Begg's funnel plot and Eggers regression test were used to assess publication bias; the leave-one-study approach was used to conduct sensitivity analysis; and the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework was used to assess certainty evidence. Result Based one literature search we included nine studies based on established criteria. The overall pooled effect measure demonstrated a statistically significant association [OR = 1.54, 95%CI(0.94-2.13), P=<0.00]. Heterogeneity, revealed significant with [ Q=34.44 , degree of freedom =8 and P < 0.001] while, the I 2 statistic test showed [I2 = 86%]. The overall studies' risk of bias was deemed to be moderate. According to subgroup analysis, the source of the heterogeneity for the studies included in the review were study location, study design and sample size. The results of sensitivity analysis were deemed not robust. Publication bias of Begg's funnel plot reported asymmetry and Egger's regression test indicated presence of publication bias with [OR= 1.38, 95%CI (0.17- 2.59) P= 0.03]. We applied the trim and fill method to adjust and enhance the symmetry. Indicated the adjusted pooled effect of [OR= 1.31, 95%CI (0.79-1.82) P= <0.001]. Certainty evidence of the studies was found to be moderate. Conclusion and recommendation According to the results of the meta-analysis, not breastfeeding is a risk factor for a higher incidence of stunting in Ethiopia. Additionally, confirmed presence of heterogeneity among the studies. In order to encourage breastfeeding and prevent the high prevalence of stunting in Ethiopia, health officials should incorporate policies into their nutrition programs.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251108544)

This study did not receive any funding

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript