Job Satisfaction and Its Determinants Among Occupational Safety Experts Working in Turkiye's Joint Health and Safety Units

Abstract

Introduction This study aims to examine the job satisfaction of occupational safety experts working in Joint Health and Safety Units (JHSUs) in Turkiye, and to identify the associated factors, including perceived competence, workload, support, and training.

Methods A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in September 2024 using an online questionnaire. A total of 102 occupational safety experts participated. The survey included sociodemographic questions, the Job Satisfaction Questionnaire, and the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale. Chi-square, post-hoc power, and regression analyses were used to explore associations between variables and job satisfaction.

Results The findings indicated that mental wellbeing, perceived competence, managerial support, and the ability to fulfill job requirements were significantly associated with higher job satisfaction. Perceived adequacy of training and concerns about job security also played a role. Despite expectations, increasing years of experience and certification class did not correspond with increased job satisfaction, suggesting that experience alone may not enhance perceived competence. The overall sample was skewed toward more experienced and highly engaged professionals, with underrepresentation of C class certified experts.

Conclusion The study provides insights into factors influencing job satisfaction among occupational safety experts and highlights the role of psychological and organizational dynamics beyond demographic characteristics. The findings underline the need for targeted strategies to improve training quality, support mechanisms, and working conditions. Furthermore, such research contributes to a broader understanding of how differing national OHS practices impact the job satisfaction and competencies of safety professionals.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics Committee of Hacettepe University gave ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Comments (0)

No login
gif