Background Tinnitus is a common auditory complaint in chronically noise-exposed individuals and may signal early cochlear dysfunction. In low-resource urban settings where informal work environments dominate, its burden and predictors remain poorly defined. This study explored the prevalence and correlates of tinnitus among generator technicians in Northern Nigeria.
Methods A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 73 male generator-repair workers aged 14–57 years. Structured interviews, pure-tone audiometry, and otoacoustic emission (OAE) testing were used to assess sociodemographic factors, noise exposure, and auditory outcomes. Logistic regression identified independent predictors of tinnitus.
Results Prevalence of tinnitus was 45.2%. Significant bivariate associations included marital status (p < 0.001), ≥10 years occupational exposure (p = 0.003), audiometric hearing loss (p = 0.026), and OAE failure (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, prolonged occupational exposure (aOR = 4.44) increased odds of tinnitus, while preserved OAE function was protective (aOR = 0.099) for tinnitus.
Conclusion Tinnitus is prevalent among informal generator workers and is strongly linked to prolonged exposure and subclinical cochlear dysfunction. Incorporating OAE screening and hearing health education into community-based programs may enable early detection and prevention of auditory damage in underserved settings.
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding StatementThe author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Kano State Ministry of Health Ethics Committee (NHREC/17/03//2018) and the Bayero University Health Research Ethics Committee (NHREC/BUK-NHREC/348/10/2311).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Comments (0)