Rationale While clinical criteria are used to diagnose and treat pneumonia in critically ill patients, rates of concordance between a clinician’s suspicion for pneumonia and a confirmed diagnosis using bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) results are undefined. Factors that contribute to diagnostic concordance, and clinical outcomes associated with diagnostic discordance, are unknown.

Objective(s) To assess rates of diagnostic concordance between clinicians’ pre-test probability of pneumonia and BAL-confirmed diagnosis, and to identify clinical factors and outcomes associated with diagnostic discordance in an intensive care unit (ICU) population.

Methods This was a single-center, prospective observational study of intubated, mechanically ventilated patients. From 2018 to 2022, clinicians were asked to provide a pre-test probability of pneumonia on the same day they performed a bronchoalveolar lavage for the patient.

Results Among 659 patients, 84% (553/659) had pneumonia. Diagnostic concordance occurred in 80% (445/553) of these cases. Clinicians assigned a low pre-test probability for pneumonia to 20% (109/553) of patients with confirmed pneumonia. Clinicians assigned a high pre-test probability for pneumonia in 28% (30/106) of patients without pneumonia. Therefore, overdiagnosis in the setting of no pneumonia occurred more often than a missed diagnosis in the setting of true pneumonia (28% vs 20%, p = 0.05). Amongst patients with pneumonia, there were no significant differences in vital signs or laboratory values between those assigned a low pre-test probability of pneumonia and those assigned a high pre-test probability of pneumonia. In patients with culture negative pneumonia (n = 117), those assigned a low pre-test probability of pneumonia, compared to those assigned a high pre-test probability of pneumonia, had a longer length of stay in the hospital (36 days vs 18 days, p = 0.02) and the ICU (21 days vs 9 days, p = 0.01).

Conclusions Over-diagnosis, rather than a missed diagnosis, is the more frequent cause of diagnostic discordance. In culture-negative pneumonia, a low-pretest probability is associated with longer lengths of stay in the hospital and ICU. Future research should explore alternative approaches to improve diagnostic accuracy in critically ill patients.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study was funded by the NIH (Research Program Number 5U19AI135964)

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The institutional review board of Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine gave ethical approval for this work. Our IRB number is #STU00204868

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.