Detection of Biofilm Production of Oral Bacterial Isolates and Its Impact on the Antibiotic Resistance Profile of These Bacterial Isolates.

ABSTRACT

Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the potential association between the formation of oral bacterial biofilms and the occurrence of antibiotic resistance among 294 oral bacterial isolates.

Study design A total of 100; 25-65year old patients were chosen. Buccal mucosa swabs were collected and cultured in appropriate media, then bacteria were isolated and identified. Then 294 bacterial isolates were assessed for biofilm production by the phenotypic method, i.e., the tissue culture plate method (TCPM). Finally, antibiotic susceptibility patterns of the 294 isolates were done by the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method for 7 β-lactam antibiotics (ampicillin, penicillin, amoxicillin, cephalothin, oxacillin, cloxacillin, and cefoxitin) and 7 non-β-lactam antibiotics (tetracycline, co-trimoxazole, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, lincomycin, and vancomycin).

Results When isolates were exposed to biofilm detection by the TCP method, 9 (3.1%) showed high biofilm formation capacity, 213 (72.4%) showed moderate biofilm formation capacity, while 72 (24.5%) showed weak/no biofilm formation. The isolated bacterial biofilms positively showed that the bacterial isolates that showed high and moderate biofilm formation capacity have a higher rate of resistance to most antibiotics with significant difference (p < 0.0001) than weak/no biofilm formation.

Conclusion The present study demonstrates that aerobic bacteria are still the major bacteria isolates from the oral cavity. Antibiotic resistance in the oral bacterial isolates was found to be associated with bacterial biofilm formation.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

N\A

Clinical Protocols

N\A

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Not Applicable

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by the Medical Ethics and Research Committee of Sana'a University's Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Approval No. 217, August 21, 2022). All participants provided written informed consent for oral swab collection.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Not Applicable

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Not Applicable

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Not Applicable

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).

Comments (0)

No login
gif