Stanhiser J, Mouille B, Flyckt R, Goldberg J, Falcone T, Goodman LR. Trends over Time and Surgical outcomes of Abdominal, Mini-laparotomy, and traditional and robotic-assisted Laparoscopy with and without Tandem Mini-laparotomy: a comparison of myomectomy techniques. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(6S):S1.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Iavazzo C, Mamais I, Gkegkes ID. Robotic assisted vs laparoscopic and/or open myomectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical evidence. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(1):5–17.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tinelli A, Hurst BS, Hudelist G, Tsin DA, Stark M, Mettler L, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy focusing on the myoma pseudocapsule: technical and outcome reports. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(2):427–35.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Holzer A, Jirecek ST, Illievich UM, Huber J, Wenzl RJ. Laparoscopic versus open myomectomy: a double-blind study to evaluate postoperative pain. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(5):1480–4.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Advincula AP, Xu X, Goudeau S, Ransom SB. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14(6):698–705.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Giannini A, Cuccu I, D’Auge TG, De Angelis E, Laganà AS, Chiantera V, et al. The great debate: Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus laparotomic myomectomy. A meta-analysis to critically evaluate current evidence and look over the horizon. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024;297:50–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bhave Chittawar P, Franik S, Pouwer AW, Farquhar C. Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(10):CD004638.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Barakat EE, Bedaiwy MA, Zimberg S, Nutter B, Nosseir M, Falcone T. Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(2 Pt 1):256–66.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pitter MC, Gargiulo AR, Bonaventura LM, Lehman JS, Srouji SS. Pregnancy outcomes following robot-assisted myomectomy. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(1):99–108.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Flyckt R, Soto E, Nutter B, Falcone T. Comparison of long-term fertility and bleeding outcomes after Robotic-Assisted, laparoscopic, and Abdominal Myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2016;2016:2789201.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sami Walid M, Heaton RL. The role of laparoscopic myomectomy in the management of uterine fibroids. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;23(4):273–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim S, Luu TH, Llarena N, Falcone T. Role of robotic surgery in treating fibroids and benign uterine mass. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;45:48–59.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hsiao S-M, Lin H-H, Peng F-S, Jen P-J, Hsiao C-F, Tu F-C. Comparison of robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy and traditional laparoscopic myomectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013;39(5):1024–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang T, Tang H, Xie Z, Deng S. Robotic-assisted vs. laparoscopic and abdominal myomectomy for treatment of uterine fibroids: a meta-analysis. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2018;27(5):249–64.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tanos V, Lee S-YC, Alexander K, Pavlou A, Balanos I, Sandhu A. Laparoscopic myomectomy complications: META analysis on RCTs and review of large cohort studies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023;287:109–18.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Palheta MS, Medeiros F das, Severiano C. Reporting of uterine fibroids on ultrasound examinations: an illustrated report template focused on surgical planning. Radiol Bras. 2023;56(2):86–94.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Desai VB, Wright JD, Gross CP, Lin H, Boscoe FP, Hutchison LM, et al. Prevalence, characteristics, and risk factors of occult uterine cancer in presumed benign hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(1):39.e1-39.e14.

Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

ACOG committee opinion 557. Management of acute abnormal uterine bleeding in nonpregnant reproductive-aged women. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(4):891–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kho RM, Desai VB, Schwartz PE, Wright JD, Gross CP, Hutchison LM, et al. Endometrial sampling for preoperative diagnosis of uterine leiomyosarcoma. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022;29(1):119–27.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Frascà C, Tuzzato G, Arena A, Degli Esposti E, Zanello M, Raimondo D, et al. The role of pelvic ultrasound in preoperative evaluation for laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(4):679–83.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wheeler KC, Goldstein SR. Transvaginal ultrasound for the diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;60(1):11–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Al-Mahrizi S, Tulandi T. Treatment of uterine fibroids for abnormal uterine bleeding: myomectomy and uterine artery embolization. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;21(6):995–1005.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kumar K, Pajai S, Baidya GR, Majhi K. Utility of saline infusion sonohysterography in gynecology: a review article. Cureus. 2023;15(2):e35424.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Aluwee SAZBS, Kato H, Zhou X, Hara T, Fujita H, Kanematsu M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of uterine fibroids: a preliminary investigation into the usefulness of 3D-rendered images for surgical planning. Springerplus. 2015;4:384.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, Ledertoug S, Olesen F. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis, mapping, and measurement of uterine myomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(3):409–15.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chapron C, Vannuccini S, Santulli P, Abrão MS, Carmona F, Fraser IS, et al. Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(3):392–411.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sato K, Yuasa N, Fujita M, Fukushima Y. Clinical application of diffusion-weighted imaging for preoperative differentiation between uterine leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(4):368.e1-368.e8.

Article  Google Scholar 

DeMulder D, Ascher SM. Uterine leiomyosarcoma: can MRI differentiate leiomyosarcoma from benign leiomyoma before treatment? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;211(6):1405–15.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Flaxman T, Sheikh A, Althobaity W, Miguel O, Cooke C, Singh S. Optimizing Pre-surgical Planning for a Complex Myomectomy using a patient-specific three-dimensional printed anatomical model. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020;42(6):697–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim YJ, Kim KG, Lee SR, Lee SH, Kang BC. Preoperative 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of Uterine Myoma and Endometrium before Myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(2):309–14.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pan H-X, Liu P, Duan H, Li P-F, Chen R-L, Tang L, et al. Using 3D MRI can potentially enhance the ability of trained surgeons to more precisely diagnose mullerian duct anomalies compared to MR Alone. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;228:313–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Armano G, Barbuto S, Wagner S, Carugno J, Bifulco G, Di Spiezio Sardo A. Incorporating 3D reconstruction in preoperative surgical planning of multiple myomectomy. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2022;14(1):87–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mercorio A, Zizolfi B, Barbuto S, Danzi R, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Moawad G, et al. Three-dimensional imaging reconstruction and laparoscopic robotic surgery: a winning combination for a complex case of multiple myomectomy. Fertil Steril. 2023;120(1):202–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee SR, Kim YJ, Kim KG. A fast 3-Dimensional magnetic resonance Imaging Reconstruction for Surgical Planning of Uterine Myomectomy. J Korean Med Sci. 2018;33(2):e12.

Article  PubMed