Rishi De-Kayne1,
Rowan Schley2,
Julia M.I. Barth3,
Luke C. Campillo4,
Catalina Chaparro-Pedraza5,
Jahnavi Joshi6,
7,
Walter Salzburger3,
Bert Van Bocxlaer8,
Darko D. Cotoras9,
10,
Carmelo Fruciano11,
12,
13,
Anthony J. Geneva14,
Rosemary Gillespie15,
Joseph Heras16,
Stephan Koblmüller17,
Blake Matthews5,
Renske E. Onstein18,
19,
Ole Seehausen5,
20,
Pooja Singh5,
20,
Erik I. Svensson21,
David Salazar-Valenzuela22,
Maarten P.M. Vanhove23,
Guinevere O.U. Wogan24,
Ryo Yamaguchi25,
26,
Anne D. Yoder27 and
José Cerca28
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95060, USA
2University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon EX4 4QE, United Kingdom
3Zoological Institute, Department of Environmental Science, University of Basel, CH-4051 Basel, Switzerland
4Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40508, USA
5Department of Fish Ecology and Evolution, EAWAG, Swiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and Technology, CH-6047 Kastanienbaum,
Switzerland
6CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, Telangana 500007, India
7Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201002, India
8CNRS, Univ. Lille, UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo, F-59000 Lille, France
9Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
10Department of Entomology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California 94118, USA
11Institute for Marine Biological Resources and Biotechnology (IRBIM), National Research Council (CNR), 98122 Messina, Italy
12National Biodiversity Future Center, 61 90133 Palermo, Italy
13Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy
14Department of Biology and Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University–Camden, Camden, New Jersey
08103, USA
15Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720,
USA
16Department of Biology, California State University, San Bernardino, California 92407, USA
17Institute of Biology, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria
18Naturalis Biodiversity Center, 2333CR Leiden, The Netherlands
19German Center for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
20Aquatic Ecology Division, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
21Department of Biology, Lund University, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden
22Centro de Investigación de la Biodiversidad y Cambio Climático (BioCamb) e Ingeniería en Biodiversidad y Recursos Genéticos,
Facultad de Ciencias de Medio Ambiente, Universidad Indoamérica, Machala y Sabanilla, Quito EC170103, Ecuador
23Research Group Zoology: Biodiversity and Toxicology, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek,
Belgium
24Department of Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078, USA
25Department of Advanced Transdisciplinary Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan
26Department of Zoology and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4,
Canada
27Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
28Department of Biosciences, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), University of Oslo, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway
Correspondence: rishidekgmail.com
Understanding the processes that drive phenotypic diversification and underpin speciation is key to elucidating how biodiversity
has evolved. Although these processes have been studied across a wide array of clades, adaptive radiations (ARs), which are
systems with multiple closely related species and broad phenotypic diversity, have been particularly fruitful for teasing
apart the factors that drive and constrain diversification. As such, ARs have become popular candidate study systems for determining
the extent to which ecological features, including aspects of organisms and the environment, and inter- and intraspecific
interactions, led to evolutionary diversification. Despite substantial past empirical and theoretical work, understanding
mechanistically how ARs evolve remains a major challenge. Here, we highlight a number of understudied components of the environment
and of lineages themselves, which may help further our understanding of speciation and AR. We also outline some substantial
remaining challenges to achieving a detailed understanding of adaptation, speciation, and the role of ecology in these processes.
These major challenges include identifying factors that have a causative impact in promoting or constraining ARs, gaining
a more holistic understanding of features of organisms and their environment that interact resulting in adaptation and speciation,
and understanding whether the role of these organismal and environmental features varies throughout the radiation process.
We conclude by providing perspectives on how future investigations into the AR process can overcome these challenges, allowing
us to glean mechanistic insights into adaptation and speciation.
Comments (0)