PROBLEM Medical education scholars struggle to join ongoing conversations in their field due to the lack of a dedicated medical education corpus. Without such a corpus, scholars must either search too widely across thousands of irrelevant journals, or too narrowly by relying on PubMed’s Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). In our tests, MeSH missed 34% of medical education papers.

APPROACH We developed the MEC (Medical Education Corpus), the first dedicated collection of medical education papers, through a three-step process. First, using the Core-Periphery model, we created the MEJ (Medical Education Journals), a collection of three groups of journals based on participation and influence in medical education discourse: the MEJ-Core (formerly the MEJ-24, 24 journals), MEJ-Adjacent (127 journals), and MEJ-Peripheral (a theoretical group). Second, we developed and evaluated a machine learning model, the MEC Classifier, trained on 4,032 manually labeled papers to identify medical education content. Finally, we applied the MEC Classifier to extract medical education papers from the MEJ-Core and MEJ-Adjacent journals.

OUTCOMES The MEC currently contains 119,137 medical education papers from the MEJ-Core (54,927 papers) and MEJ-Adjacent journals (64,210 papers). In our evaluation using 1,358 test papers, the MEC Classifier demonstrated significantly improved sensitivity compared to MeSH (90% vs 66%, p = 0.001), even while maintaining a similar positive predictive value (82% vs 81%).

NEXT STEPS The MEC provides a focused, searchable corpus that enables medical education scholars to more easily join conversations in the field. Scholars can now rely on the MEC when reviewing literature to frame their work, and the MEC also creates opportunities for field-wide analyses and meta-research. The MEC is freely available in the Supplement and is regularly updated on MedEdMentor (mededmentor.org), where we will also incorporate community feedback to further improve and expand the corpus.

Gregory M. Ow and Geoffrey V. Stetson are co-owners of MedEdMentor LLC.

Geoffrey V. Stetson receives funding from the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation. The funding did not directly support this work, but supports Dr. Stetson's research time.

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Labeling, education scholarship guidance, manuscript feedback/editing

Labeling, Covidence management for paper labeling, PubMed sampling, library science guidance, manuscript feedback/editing

Education scholarship guidance, labeling, manuscript feedback/editing

Overall guidance and direction, labeling, manuscript feedback/editing

Funding Geoffrey V. Stetson receives funding from the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation.

Conflicts of Interests Gregory M. Ow and Geoffrey V. Stetson are co-owners of MedEdMentor LLC.

Disclosures Usage of AI. Claude 3.5 Sonnet and OpenAI o1-preview were used to brainstorm topics, critique language, provide editing for clarity, and assist with technical development.