Gotberg M, Cook CM, Sen S, Nijjer S, Escaned J, Davies JE. The evolving future of instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(11):1379–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.770.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NH, Barbato E, Tonino P, Piroth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(13):1208–17. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1408758.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(11):991–1001. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1205361.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(3):407–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, Bates ER, Beckie TM, Bischoff JM, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: Executive Summary: a Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145(3):e4–17. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001039.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nakano S, Kohsaka S, Chikamori T, Fukushima K, Kobayashi Y, Kozuma K, et al. JCS 2022 guideline focused update on diagnosis and treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Circ J. 2022;86(5):882–915. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-21-1041.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, De Bruyne B, Gould KL. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1993;87(4):1354–67. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.87.4.1354.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Park SJ, Kang SJ, Ahn JM, Shim EB, Kim YT, Yun SC, et al. Visual-functional mismatch between coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(10):1029–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.07.007.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Faria D, Hennessey B, Shabbir A, Mejia-Renteria H, Wang L, Lee JM, et al. Functional coronary angiography for the assessment of the epicardial vessels and the microcirculation. EuroIntervention. 2023;19(3):203–21. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00969.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Morris PD, Ryan D, Morton AC, Lycett R, Lawford PV, Hose DR, et al. Virtual fractional flow reserve from coronary angiography: modeling the significance of coronary lesions: results from the VIRTU-1 (VIRTUal Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary Angiography) study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(2):149–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.08.024.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Papafaklis MI, Muramatsu T, Ishibashi Y, Lakkas LS, Nakatani S, Bourantas CV, et al. Fast virtual functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions using routine angiographic data and blood flow simulation in humans: comparison with pressure wire—fractional flow reserve. EuroIntervention. 2014;10(5):574–83. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJY14M07_01.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, von Birgelen C, Ferrara A, Pellicano M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fast computational approaches to derive fractional flow reserve from diagnostic coronary angiography: the International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(19):2024–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.013.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kornowski R, Lavi I, Pellicano M, Xaplanteris P, Vaknin-Assa H, Assali A, et al. Fractional flow reserve derived from routine coronary angiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(20):2235–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.051.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mejia-Renteria H, Lee JM, Choi KH, Lee SH, Wang L, Kakuta T, et al. Coronary microcirculation assessment using functional angiography: development of a wire-free method applicable to conventional coronary angiograms. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;98(6):1027–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29863.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ai H, Feng Y, Gong Y, Zheng B, Jin Q, Zhang HP, et al. Coronary angiography-derived index of microvascular resistance. Front Physiol. 2020;11: 605356. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.605356.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hong H, Li C, Gutierrez-Chico JL, Wang Z, Huang J, Chu M, et al. Radial wall strain: a novel angiographic measure of plaque composition and vulnerability. EuroIntervention. 2022;18(12):1001–10. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00537.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Roguin A, Abu Dogosh A, Feld Y, Konigstein M, Lerman A, Koifman E. Early feasibility of automated artificial intelligence angiography based fractional flow reserve estimation. Am J Cardiol. 2021;139:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.10.022.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tu S, Xu L, Ligthart J, Xu B, Witberg K, Sun Z, et al. In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28(6):1315–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0016-6.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL, Dodge JT Jr, Alexander B Jr, Marble SJ, et al. TIMI frame count: a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Circulation. 1996;93(5):879–88.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xu B, Tu S, Qiao S, Qu X, Chen Y, Yang J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of angiography-based quantitative flow ratio measurements for online assessment of coronary stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(25):3077–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.035.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Westra J, Tu S, Campo G, Qiao S, Matsuo H, Qu X, et al. Diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio in prospectively enrolled patients: An individual patient-data meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;94(5):693–701. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28283.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Witberg G, De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Achenbach S, Engstrom T, Matsuo H, et al. Diagnostic performance of angiogram-derived fractional flow reserve: a pooled analysis of 5 prospective cohort studies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(4):488–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.10.045.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Witberg G, Bental T, Levi A, Talmor-Barkan Y, Rotholz A, Tanigaki T, et al. Clinical outcomes of FFRangio-guided treatment for coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15(4):468–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2021.11.039.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Omori H, Witberg G, Kawase Y, Tanigaki T, Okamoto S, Hirata T, et al. Angiogram based fractional flow reserve in patients with dual/triple vessel coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol. 2019;283:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.072.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Masdjedi K, van Zandvoort LJC, Balbi MM, Gijsen FJH, Ligthart JMR, Rutten MCM, et al. Validation of a three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography-based software to calculate fractional flow reserve: the FAST study. EuroIntervention. 2020;16(7):591–9. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00466.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Masdjedi K, Tanaka N, Van Belle E, Porouchani S, Linke A, Woitek FJ, et al. Vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) for the assessment of stenosis severity: the FAST II study. EuroIntervention. 2022;17(18):1498–505. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00471.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ikeda K, Kobayashi M, Chikamori T, Yanaka Y, Takagi R, Kani J, et al. Comparison between the diagnostic performance of vessel fractional flow reserve and nonhyperemic pressure ratio for functionally significant coronary stenosis severity as assessed by fractional flow reserve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;101(1):72–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30511.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Muramatsu T, Kozuma K, Tanabe K, Morino Y, Ako J, Nakamura S, et al. Clinical expert consensus document on drug-coated balloon for coronary artery disease from the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2023;38(2):166–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-023-00921-2.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jeger RV, Eccleshall S, Wan Ahmad WA, Ge J, Poerner TC, Shin ES, et al. Drug-coated balloons for coronary artery disease: third report of the International DCB Consensus Group. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(12):1391–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.043.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Collet C, Onuma Y, Sonck J, Asano T, Vandeloo B, Kornowski R, et al. Diagnostic performance of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(35):3314–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy445.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cerrato E, Mejia-Renteria H, Dehbi HM, Ahn JM, Cook C, Dupouy P, et al. Revascularization deferral of nonculprit stenoses on the basis of fractional flow reserve: 1-year outcomes of 8,579 patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(16):1894–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.05.024.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xu B, Tu S, Song L, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G, et al. Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;398(10317):2149–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02248-0.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Andersen BK, Sejr-Hansen M, Westra J, Campo G, Efterkhari A, Tu S, et al. Quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: design and rationale of the randomised FAVOR III Europe Japan trial. EuroIntervention. 2023;18(16):e1358–64. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00214.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar