Assessing the Effectiveness of ChatGPT as a Clinical Trainee: A Study on the Diagnostic Value of Large Language Models in a Complex Clinical Environment

Abstract

We tested the performance of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) in the role of a trainee clinician (Specialist Registrar or Resident) undergoing direct assessment by a human supervising specialist clinician (Consultant or Attending). The session consisted of a hospital ward round scenario presented to three versions of ChatGPT, namely OpenAI ChatGPT-3.5, Bing ChatGPT-4 and OpenAI ChatGPT-4. A specific test of memory and context was included via an end-of-teaching educator feedback exercise. Only OpenAI ChatGPT-4 provided responses comparable to the standard a trainee might offer during progress towards completion of training and specialist accreditation. Bing ChatGPT-4 responded with several clinically dubious statements, often in a repetitive and detached way, and was unable to retain awareness of the purpose of the session and the identities of participants.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript

Comments (0)

No login
gif