Enlow DH, Hans MG. Essentials of facial growth. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1996. p. 1–110.

Google Scholar 

Rakosi T, Jonas I, Graber TM. Color atlas of medicine: orthodontic-diagnosis. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc.; 1993. p. 6–33.

Google Scholar 

Coşkuner HG, Kocadereli İ. Farklı malokluzyonlarda temporomandibular eklem pozisyonlarının değerlendirilmesi. Acta Odontol Turc. 2013;30(3):157–61.

Google Scholar 

Baccetti T, Antonini A, Franchi L, Tonti M, Tollaro I. Glenoid fossa position in different facial types: a cephalometric study. Br J Orthod. 1997;24(1):55–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Burke G, Major P, Glover K, Prasad N. Correlations between condylar characteristics and facial morphology in class II preadolescent patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998;114(3):328–36.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ikai A, Sugisaki M, Young-Sung K, Tanabe H. Morphologic study of the mandibular fossa and the eminence of the temporomandibular joint in relation to the facial structures. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997;112(6):634–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Singh M, Chakrabarty A. Anatomical variations in condylar shape and symmetry: study of 100 patients. Int J Sci Res. 2015;4(12):933–5.

Google Scholar 

Yasa Y, Akgül HM. Comparative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of the osseous morphology of the temporomandibular joint in temporomandibular dysfunction patients and asymptomatic individuals. Oral Radiol. 2018;34(1):31–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

White SC, Pharoah MJ. Other imaging modalities. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ, editors. Oral Radiology: principles and ınterpretation. 7th ed. St Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.

Google Scholar 

Harorlı A, Akgül M, Dağıstan S (2012) Diş Hekimliği Radyolojisi Kitabı, Erzurum: Eser Ofset Matbaacılık 80–150.

Al-koshas M, Nambiar P, John J. Assessment of the condyle and glenoid fossa morphology using CBCT in South-East Asians. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3): e0121682.

Article  Google Scholar 

Krisjane Z, Urtane I, Krumina G, Zepa K. Three-dimensional evaluation of TMJ parameters in Class II and Class III patients. Stomatologija. 2009;11(1):32–6.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Paknahad M, Shahidi S. Association between condylar position and vertical skeletal craniofacial morphology: a cone beam computed tomography study. Int Orthod. 2017;15(4):740–51.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Park I-Y, Kim J-H, Park Y-H. Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography-based comparison of condylar position and morphology according to the vertical skeletal pattern. Korean J Orthodont. 2015;45(2):66–73.

Article  Google Scholar 

McNamara JA. Components of Class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age. Angle Orthod. 1981;51(3):177–202.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Siriwat PP, Jarabak JR. Malocclusion and facial morphology is there a relationship? An epidemiologic study. Angle Orthodont. 1985;55(2):127–38.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

George D, Mallery P. SPSS for windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. 11.0 update. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2003.

Google Scholar 

Odabaş B, Arslan SG. Temporomandibular eklem anatomisi ve rahatsızlıkları. Dicle Tıp Dergisi. 2008;35(1):77–85.

Google Scholar 

Zhang ZL, Cheng JG, Li G, Zhang JZ, Zhang ZY, Ma XC. Measurement accuracy of temporomandibular joint space in Promax 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;114:112–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Büyük S, Halıcıoğlu K, Çelikoğlu M, Şekerci A, Ünal T, Kilkiş D. Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Kullanılarak Elde Edilen İki Ve Üç Boyutlu Lateral Sefalometrik Analizlerin Karşılaştırılması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2014;24(2):213–8.

Google Scholar 

Kumar V, Ludlow J, Soares, Cevidanes LH, Mol A. In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:873–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ueda HM, Ishizuka Y, Mıyamoto K, Morımoto N, Tanne K. Relationship between masticatory muscle activity and vertical craniofacial morphology. Angle Orthod. 1998;68:233–8.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ueda HM, Mıyamoto K, Saıfuddın M, Ishızuka Y, Tanne K. Masticatory muscle activity in children and adults with different facial types. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;118:63–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Proffit WR, Fields HW. Occlusal forces in normal-and long-face children. J Dent Res. 1983;62(5):571–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

He T, Olsson S, Daugaard JR, Kılıarıdıs S. Functional influence of masticatory muscles on the fiber characteristics and capillary distribution in growing ferrets (Mustela putonusfuro): a histochemical analysis. Arch Oral Biol. 2004;49:983–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rodrigues AF, Fraga MR, Vitral RWF. Computed tomography evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in Class II Division 1 and Class III malocclusion patients: condylar symmetry and condyle-fossa relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;136(2):199–206.

Article  Google Scholar 

Vitral RWF, de Souza TC. Computed tomography evaluation of temporomandibular joint alterations in class II Division 1 subdivision patients: condylar symmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2002;121(4):369–75.

Article  Google Scholar 

Seren E, Akan H, Toller MO, Akyar S. An evaluation of the condylar position of the temporomandibular joint by computerized tomography in Class III malocclusions: a preliminary study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1994;105(5):483–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cohlmia JT, Ghosh J, Sinha PK, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Tomographic assessment of temporomandibular joints in patients with malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1996;66(1):27–36.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

O’Ryan F, Epker BN. Temporomandibular joint function and morphology: observations on the spectra of normalcy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984;58(3):272–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Çağlayan F, Sümbüllü MA, Akgül HM. Associations between the articular eminence inclination and condylar bone changes, condylar movements, and condyle and fossa shapes. Oral Radiol. 2013;30(1):84–91.

Article  Google Scholar 

Katsavrias EG. Changes in articular eminence inclination during the craniofacial growth period. Angle Orthod. 2002;72(3):258–64.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Katsavrias EG, Halazonetis DJ. Condyle and fossa shape in Class II and Class III skeletal patterns: a morphometric tomographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2005;128(3):337–46.

Article  Google Scholar 

Akahane Y, Deguchi T, Hunt NP. Morphology of the temporomandibular joint in skeletal class iii symmetrical and asymmetrical cases: a study by cephalometric laminography. J Orthod. 2001;28(2):119–28.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lobo F, Tolentino ES, Iwaki LCV, Walewski LÂ, Takeshita WM, Chicarelli M. Imaginology tridimensional study of temporomandibular joint osseous components according to sagittal skeletal relationship, sex, and age. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30:1462–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Arieta-Miranda JM, Silva-Valencia M, Flores-Mir C, Paredes-Sampen NA, Arriola-Guillen LE. Spatial analysis of condyle position according to sagittal skeletal relationship, assessed by cone beam computed tomography. Prog Orthod. 2013;14:36.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Moscagiuri F, Caroccia F, Lopes C, Di Carlo B, Di Maria E, Festa F, Dattilio M. Evaluation of articular eminence inclination in normo-divergent subjects with different skeletal classes through CBCT. Int J Environm Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):5992.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jiang H, Li C, Wang Z, Cao J, Shi X, Ma J, Liu H. Assessment of osseous morphology of temporomandibular joint in asymptomatic participants with chewing-side preference. J Oral Rehabil. 2015;42(2):105–12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Raustia AM, Pyhtinen J. Morphology of the condyles and mandibular fossa as seen by computed tomography. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63(1):77–82.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pandis N, Karpac J, Trevino R, Williams B. A radiographic study of condyle position at various depths of cut in dry skulls with axially corrected lateral tomograms. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1991;100(2):116–22.

Article  Google Scholar 

Yale SH, Allison BD, Hauptfuehrer JD. An epidemiological assessment of mandibular condyle morphology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1966;21(2):169–77.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Merigue LF, Conti ACDCF, Oltramari-Navarro PVP, Navarro RDL, Almeıda MRD. Tomographic evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in malocclusion subjects: condylar morphology and position. Braz Oral Res. 2016;30(1):e17.

Article  Google Scholar 

Katsavrias EG. Morphology of the temporomandibular joint in subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;129(4):470–8.

Article  Google Scholar