Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Department of General Practice and Rural Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
2 Department of Business Studies, University of Iceland, Saemundargata, Reykjavik, Iceland
3 DBA Programme, Otago Business School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
4 Department of Management, Otago Business School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
Abstract
BackgroundMethods
The evaluation was informed by Beer’s Viable System Model (VSM). A qualitative exploratory design with semi-structured interviews and documents analysis using thematic analysis was used. We conducted 28 interviews with senior healthcare managers and reviewed over 300 official documents and news analyses.
Results
The VSM posits that for a system to be viable, all its five sub-systems (operations; co-ordination; operational control; development and governance) need to be strong. Our analysis suggests that the health reforms, despite their strengths, do not satisfy this requirement. The reforms do appreciate the complexity of the healthcare environment: multiple stakeholders, social inequalities, interdependencies. However, our analysis suggests a severe lack of detail regarding the implementation and operationalisation of the reforms. Furthermore, resourcing and coordination within the reformed system is also unclear.
Conclusions
The health system reforms may not lead to a viable future NZ health system. Poor communication of the reform implementation and operationalisation will likely result in system failure and inhibit the ability of frontline health organisations to deliver care.
Keywords
Comments (0)