Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in Caesarean sections. Lancet 2018; 392: 1341–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31928-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maeda E, Ishihara O, Tomio J, et al. Cesarean section rates and local resources for perinatal care in Japan: a nationwide ecological study using the national database of health insurance claims. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2018; 44: 208–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13518

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maeda E, Ishihara O, Tomio J, et al. Cesarean delivery rates for overall and multiple pregnancies in Japan: a descriptive study using nationwide health insurance claims data. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2021; 47: 2099–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14772

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Survey of medical institutions [Japanese]. Available from URL: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/iryosd/20/dl/02sisetu02.pdf (accessed July 2023).

American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology 2016; 124: 270–300. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000000935

Ring L, Landau R, Delgado C. The current role of general anesthesia for Cesarean delivery. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 2021; 11: 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-021-00437-6

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Evans E. Information for mothers about analgesia and anaesthesia during delivery. In: Lucas N (Ed.). Raising the Standards: Royal College of Anaesthetists Quality Improvement Compendium, 4th edition. London: The Royal College of Anaesthetists; 2020: 241–68.

Google Scholar 

Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology 2007; 18: 805–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0b013e3181577511

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kimura S, Sato T, Ikeda S, Noda M, Nakayama T. Development of a database of health insurance claims: standardization of disease classifications and anonymous record linkage. J Epidemiol 2010; 20: 413–9. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.je20090066

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yonekura H, Ide K, Seto K, et al. Preoperative pulmonary function tests before low-risk surgery in Japan: a retrospective cohort study using a claims database. J Anesth 2018; 32: 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-017-2423-2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yonekura H, Seto K, Ide K, et al. Preoperative blood tests conducted before low-risk surgery in Japan: a retrospective observational study using a nationwide insurance claims database. Anesth Analg 2018; 126: 1633–40. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002734

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yonekura H, Ide K, Kanazawa Y, et al. Use of preoperative haemostasis and ABO blood typing tests in children: a retrospective observational study using a nationwide claims database in Japan. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e032306. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032306

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Abe H, Sumitani M, Uchida K, et al. Association between mode of anaesthesia and severe maternal morbidity during admission for scheduled Caesarean delivery: a nationwide population-based study in Japan, 2010–2013. Br J Anaesth 2018; 120: 779–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.101

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guglielminotti J, Landau R, Li G. Adverse events and factors associated with potentially avoidable use of general anesthesia in Cesarean deliveries. Anesthesiology 2019; 130: 912–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000002629

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bateman BT, Mhyre JM, Hernandez-Diaz S, et al. Development of a comorbidity index for use in obstetric patients. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 957–65. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e3182a603bb

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2005; 43: 1130–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aoyama K, D'Souza R, Inada E, Lapinsky SE, Fowler RA. Measurement properties of comorbidity indices in maternal health research: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017; 17: 372. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1558-3

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Metcalfe A, Lix LM, Johnson JA, et al. Validation of an obstetric comorbidity index in an external population. BJOG 2015; 122: 1748–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13254

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Singh S, Farber MK, Bateman BT, et al. Obstetric comorbidity index and the odds of general vs. neuraxial anesthesia in women undergoing Cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Obstet Anesth 2022; 51: 103546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2022.103546

Yonekura H, Mazda Y, Noguchi S, Tsunobuchi H, Shimaoka M. Current epidemiology of the general anesthesia practice for Cesarean delivery using a nationwide claims database in Japan: a descriptive study. J Clin Med 2022; 11: 4808. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164808

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Odor PM, Bampoe S, Moonesinghe SR, et al. General anaesthetic and airway management practice for obstetric surgery in England: a prospective, multicentre observational study. Anaesthesia 2021; 76: 460–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15250

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ooba N, Setoguchi S, Ando T, et al. Claims-based definition of death in Japanese claims database: validity and implications. PLoS One 2013; 8: e66116. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066116

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Guglielminotti J, Wong CA, Landau R, Li G. Temporal trends in anesthesia-related adverse events in Cesarean deliveries, New York State, 2003–2012. Anesthesiology 2015; 123: 1013–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000000846

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Butwick AJ, Bentley J, Wong CA, Snowden JM, Sun E, Guo N. United States state-level variation in the use of neuraxial analgesia during labor for pregnant women. JAMA Netw Open 2018; 1: e186567. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6567

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Merlo J, Chaix B, Ohlsson H, et al. A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60: 290–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.029454

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Guasch E, Brogly N, Mercier FJ, et al. European minimum standards for obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia departments: an experts’ consensus. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2020; 37: 1115–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000001362

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gelb AW, Morriss WW, Johnson W, Merry AF, International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia Workgroup. World Health Organization-World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists (WHO-WFSA) international standards for a safe practice of anesthesia. Can J Anesth 2018; 65: 698–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-018-1111-5

Juang J, Gabriel RA, Dutton RP, Palanisamy A, Urman RD. Choice of anesthesia for Cesarean delivery: an analysis of the National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 1914–7. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000001677

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Palanisamy A, Mitani AA, Tsen LC. General anesthesia for Cesarean delivery at a tertiary care hospital from 2000 to 2005: a retrospective analysis and 10-year update. Int J Obstet Anesth 2011; 20: 10–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.07.002

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sumikura H. Keep our guard up against general anesthesia for Cesarean section. J Anesth 2012; 26: 324–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-012-1403-9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sumikura H. When was the last time you induced general anesthesia for Cesarean section. J Anesth 2015; 29: 819–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-015-1985-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Traynor AJ, Aragon M, Ghosh D, et al. Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey: a 30-year update. Anesth Analg 2016; 122: 1939–46. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000001204

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yonekura H, Mazda Y, Noguchi S, Tsunobuchi H, Shimaoka M. Trend in neuraxial morphine use and postoperative analgesia after Cesarean delivery in Japan from 2005 to 2020. Sci Rep 2022; 12: 17234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22165-5

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Naik BI, Kuck K, Saager L, et al. Practice patterns and variability in intraoperative opioid utilization: a report from the multicenter perioperative outcomes group. Anesth Analg 2022; 134: 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000005663

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reed SE, Tan HS, Fuller ME, et al. Analgesia after Cesarean delivery in the United States 2008–2018: a retrospective cohort study. Anesth Analg 2021; 133: 1550–8. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000005587

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Butwick AJ, Palanisamy A. Mode of anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery and maternal morbidity: can we overcome confounding by indication. Br J Anaesth 2018; 120: 621–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.01.002

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Japan Maternal Death Exploratory Committee. Annual report of JMDEC; recommendations for saving mothers [Japanese]. Available from URL: https://www.jaog.or.jp/wp/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/botai_2021.pdf (accessed July 2023).

Nagai K, Tanaka T, Kodaira N, Kimura S, Takahashi Y, Nakayama T. Data resource profile: JMDC claims database sourced from health insurance societies. J Gen Fam Med 2021; 22: 118–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.422

Article