Gestational diabetes as a risk factor for GBS maternal rectovaginal colonization: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

Background Maternal rectovaginal colonization by group B Streptococcus (GBS) increases the risk of perinatal GBS disease that can lead to death or long-term neurological impairment. Factors that increase the risk of rectovaginal GBS carriage are incompletely understood resulting in missed opportunities for detecting GBS in risk-based clinical approaches. There is a lacking consensus on whether gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a risk factor for rectovaginal GBS. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to address current conflicting findings and determine whether GDM should be clinically considered as a risk factor for maternal GBS colonization.

Methods Peer-reviewed studies that provided GDM prevalence and documented GBS vaginal and/or rectal colonization in women with and without GDM were included in this analysis.

From study inception to October 30, 2023, we identified 6,275 relevant studies from EMBASE and PUBMED of which 19 were eligible for inclusion. Eligible studies were analyzed and thoroughly assessed for risk of bias with a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale that interrogated representativeness and comparability of cohorts, quality of reporting for GDM and GBS status, and potential bias from other metabolic diseases. Results were synthesized using STATA 18 and analyzed using random-effects meta-analyses.

Results Studies encompassed 266,706 women from 10 different countries, with study periods spanning from 1981 to 2020. Meta-analysis revealed that gestational diabetes is associated with a 16% increased risk of rectovaginal GBS carriage (OR 1.16, CI 1.07-1.26, P = 0.003). We also performed subgroup analyses to assess independent effects of pregestational vs. gestational diabetes on risk of maternal GBS carriage. Pregestational diabetes (Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus) was also associated with an increased risk of 76% (pooled OR 1.76, CI 1.27-2.45, P = 0.0008).

Conclusions This study achieved a consensus among previously discrepant observations and demonstrated that gestational diabetes and pregestational diabetes are significant risk factors for maternal rectovaginal carriage of GBS. Recognition of GDM as a risk factor during clinical decisions about GBS screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis may decrease the global burden of GBS on maternal-perinatal health.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

VME and JZ were supported by NIH F31 awards (AI167547, DK136201-01) respectively. VME was also supported by a scholarship from Baylor Research Advocates for Student Scientists (BRASS) and a Grant for Emerging Researchers/Clinicians Mentorship [58] Program from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). JJZ was supported by an NIH T32 award (T32GM136554). Studies were supported by a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Next Gen Pregnancy Initiative (NGP10103), NIH R01 (DK128053), and R21 (AI173448) to KAP.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study used only openly available human data from publications. Studies were identified through a database search that included PubMed and EMBASE, which encompassed MEDLINE and preprints as sources The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article, and in the cited studies included in the meta-analysis.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article, and in the cited studies included in the meta-analysis.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONSGBSGroup B StreptococcusIAPIntrapartum antibiotic prophylaxisEOGBSEarly-onset GBS diseaseGDMGestational diabetes mellitus

Comments (0)

No login
gif