Zhang Y, Qu Y, Gao K, Yang Q, Shi B, Hou P, Ji M. High copy number of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) predicts good prognosis in glioma patients. Am J Cancer Res. 2015;5(3):1207.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chial H. DNA sequencing technologies key to the Human Genome Project. Nat Educ. 2008;1(1):219.

Google Scholar 

Crow JF. Unequal by nature: a geneticist’s perspective on human differences. Daedalus. 2002;131(1):81–8.

Google Scholar 

Jonsson H, Magnusdottir E, Eggertsson HP, Stefansson OA, Arnadottir GA, Eiriksson O, Zink F, Helgason EA, Jonsdottir I, Gylfason A, Jonasdottir A. Differences between germline genomes of monozygotic twins. Nat Genet. 2021;53(1):27–34.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

National Institutes of Health: What are single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Genetics Home Reference-NIH. US National Library ofMedicine. https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/genomicresearch/snp (2019)

Claussnitzer M, Cho JH, Collins R, Cox NJ, Dermitzakis ET, Hurles ME, Kathiresan S, Kenny EE, Lindgren CM, MacArthur DG, North KN. A brief history of human disease genetics. Nature. 2020;577(7789):179–89.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chial H. Rare genetic disorders: learning about genetic disease through gene mapping, SNPs, and microarray data. Nat Educ. 2008;1(1):192.

Google Scholar 

Inusa BP, Hsu LL, Kohli N, Patel A, Ominu-Evbota K, Anie KA, Atoyebi W. Sickle cell disease—Genetics, pathophysiology, clinical presentation and treatment. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2019;5(2):20.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Alliance G. Understanding genetics: a district of Columbia guide for patients and health professionals. Appendix C Genetic Testing Methodologies. (2010).

Durmaz AA, Karaca E, Demkow U, Toruner G, Schoumans J, Cogulu O. Evolution of genetic techniques: past, present, and beyond. Biomed Res Int. 2015;22:2015.

Google Scholar 

Hogarth S, Saukko P. A market in the making: the past, present and future of direct-to-consumer genomics. New Genet Soc. 2017;36(3):197–208.

Article  Google Scholar 

Oh B. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: advantages and pitfalls. Genom Inform. 2019. https://doi.org/10.5808/GI.2019.17.3.e33.

Article  Google Scholar 

Guerrini CJ, Wagner JK, Nelson SC, Javitt GH, McGuire AL. Who’s on third? Regulation of third-party genetic interpretation services. Genet Med. 2020;22(1):4–11.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Phillips KA, Trosman JR, Douglas MP. Emergence of hybrid models of genetic testing beyond direct-to-consumer or traditional labs. JAMA. 2019;321(24):2403–4.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ashclinicalnews.org. No FDA Oversight of Some Genetic Testing Companies. ASH Clinical News. 2018 [cited 2023 Mar 23]. Available from https://www.ashclinicalnews.org/online-exclusive/no-fda-oversight-genetic-testing-companies/

Friend L, Rivilin A, O’Neil J, Browne R. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Opportunities and risks in a rapidly evolving market, vol. 12. Amstelveen: KPMG International; 2018.

Google Scholar 

Regalado A. More than 26 million people have taken an at-home ancestry test. MIT Technol Rev. 2019;11(2):2019.

Google Scholar 

Janzen T. International Society of Genetic Genealogy (ISOGG) WIKI. Autosomal DNA testing comparison chart: International Society of Genetic Genealogy Wiki; 2021.

Google Scholar 

FDA. Direct-to-Consumer Tests. [cited 2024 Mar]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/in-vitro-diagnostics/direct-consumer-tests

Tandy-Connor S, Guiltinan J, Krempely K, LaDuca H, Reineke P, Gutierrez S, Gray P, Davis BT. False-positive results released by direct-to-consumer genetic tests highlight the importance of clinical confirmation testing for appropriate patient care. Genet Med. 2018;20(12):1515–21.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

FDA. GUIDANCE D. General Wellness: Policy for Low-Risk Devices Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. [cited 2023 May]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/general-wellness-policy-low-risk-devices

FDA. Laboratory Developed Tests. [cited 2023 Mar]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/in-vitro-diagnostics/laboratory-developed-tests

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA). [cited 2023 Mar]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/CLIA

Martinez C. Privacy best practices for consumer genetic testing services. In: Future of Privacy Forum 2018.

Brown A. DNA Testing Is Popular, But Many Are Unaware of Privacy Concerns. Triple Pundit 2018. Available from: https://www.triplepundit.com/story/2018/dna-testing-popular-many-are-unaware-privacy-concerns/55936

Pitts P. The Privacy Delusions of Genetic Testing. Forbes 2017. Available from:https://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2017/02/15/the-privacy-delusions-of-genetic-testing/?sh=2411274f1bba

Fox M. Drug giant Glaxo teams up with DNA testing company 23andMe. NBC News 2018. https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/drug-giant-glaxo-teams-dna-testing-company-23andme-n894531

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. [cited 2023 May]. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/laws-regulations/index.html

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008. [cited 2023 May]. Available from: https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/genetic-information-nondiscrimination-act-2008

Nations E. Direct-to Consumer Genetic Testing Companies: Is Genetic Data Adequately Protected in the Absence of HIPPA? USC Gould 2023. [cited 2023 May]. Available from: https://lawforbusiness.usc.edu/direct-to-consumer-generic-testing-companies-is-genetic-data-adequately-protected-in-the-absence-of-hippa/

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Genetic Counseling. [cited 2023 Mar]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/genomics/gtesting/genetic_counseling.htm

Cohen SA, Bradbury A, Henderson V, Hoskins K, Bednar E, Arun BK. Genetic counseling and testing in a community setting: quality, access, and efficiency. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019;17(39):e34-44.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jonas MC, Suwannarat P, Burnett-Hartman A, Carroll N, Turner M, Janes K, Truong C, Blum-Barnett E, Aziz N, McGlynn EA. Physician experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Kaiser Permanente. J Pers Med. 2019;9(4):47.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Martins MF, Murry LT, Telford L, Moriarty F. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an updated systematic review of healthcare professionals’ knowledge and views, and ethical and legal concerns. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022;30(12):1331–43.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar