Pisani MX, Presotto AGC, Mesquita MF et al (2018) Biomechanical behavior of 2-implant– and single-implant–retained mandibular overdentures with conventional or mini implants. J Prosthet Dent 120:421–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.12.012

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Desai SR, Desai MS, Katti G, Karthikeyan I (2012) Evaluation of design parameters of eight dental implant designs : a two ‑ dimensional finite element analysis. 15:

Tardelli JDC, da Costa Valente ML, Macedo AP, dos Reis AC (2021) Evaluation of biomechanical and stress distribution of different dental implant designs: primary stability and photoelastic analysis. IRBM. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irbm.2021.01.003

Hisam MJ, Zaman I, Sharif S et al (2019) Finite element analysis of mini implant biomechanics on peri-implant bone. Procedia Manuf 30:308–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.044

Article  Google Scholar 

Valente MLC, Bolfarini C, Oliveira De DP (2014) Dental mini-implant designs to support overdentures : development, biomechanical evaluation, and 3D digital image correlation. J Prosthet Dent 128(4):754–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.043

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

de Souza RF, Ribeiro AB, Della Vecchia MP et al (2015) Mini vs. Standard Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: a Randomized Trial. J Dent Res 94:1376–1384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515601959

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C et al (2009) Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients–the York Consensus Statement. Br Dent J 207:185–186. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.728

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bidra AS, Almas K (2013) Mini implants for definitive prosthodontic treatment: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 109:156–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60035-9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

de Souza RF, Jabbar AA, Jafarpour D, et al (2022) Single-implant overdentures retained by a novel attachment: a mixed methods crossover randomized clinical trial. JDR Clin Transl Res 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/23800844221124083

Hartmann R, de Menezes Bandeira ACF, de Araújo SC et al (2020) Cost-effectiveness of three different concepts for the rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles: overdentures with 1 or 2 implant attachments and hybrid prosthesis on four implants. J Oral Rehabil 47:1394–1402. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13071

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Do TA, Le HS, Shen YW, et al (2020) Risk factors related to late failure of dental implant—a systematic review of recent studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113931

Marcello-Machado RM, Faot F, Schuster AJ et al (2018) Mini-implants and narrow diameter implants as mandibular overdenture retainers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes. J Oral Rehabil 45:161–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12585

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kumari P, Verma M, Sainia V et al (2016) Mini-Implants, mega solutions: a case series. J Prosthodont 25:682–686. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12382

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Catalán A, Martínez A, Marchesani F, González U (2016) Mandibular overdentures retained by two mini-implants: a seven-year retention and satisfaction study. J Prosthodont 25:364–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12373

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Valente MLC, Bolfarini C, de Oliveira DP, dos Reis AC (2022) Dental mini-implant designs to support overdentures: Ddevelopment, biomechanical evaluation, and 3D digital image correlation. J Prosthet Dent 128:754–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.043

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Warin P, Rungsiyakull P, Rungsiyakull C, Khongkhunthian P (2018) Effects of different numbers of mini-dental implants on alveolar ridge strain distribution under mandibular implant-retained overdentures. J Prosthodont Res 62:35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.05.002

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Attard NJ, Zarb GA, Laporte A (2005) Long-term treatment costs associated with implant-supported mandibular prostheses in edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 18:117–123

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Beikler T, Flemmig TF (2015) EAO consensus conference: economic evaluation of implant-supported prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 26:57–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12630

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Scepanovic M, Calvo-Guirado JL, Markovic A et al (2012) A 1-year prospective cohort study on mandibular overdentures retained by mini dental implants. Eur J Oral Implantol 5:367–379

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maryod WH, Ali SM, Shawky AF (2014) Immediate versus early loading of mini-implants supporting mandibular overdentures: a preliminary 3-year clinical outcome report. Int J Prosthodont 27:553–560. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3845

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Preoteasa E, Meleşcanu-Imre M, Preoteasa CT et al (2010) Aspects of oral morphology as decision factors in mini-implant supported overdenture. Rom J Morphol Embryol Rev Roum Morphol Embryol 51:309–314

Google Scholar 

Borges GA, Codello DJ, Del Rio Silva L, et al (2022) Factors and clinical outcomes for standard and mini-implants retaining mandibular overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.010

Griffitts TM, Collins CP, Collins PC (2005) Mini dental implants: an adjunct for retention, stability, and comfort for the edentulous patient. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 100:e81–e84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.06.018

Article  Google Scholar 

Lemos CA, Verri FR, de Souza Batista VE et al (2017) Complete overdentures retained by mini implants: a systematic review. J Dent 57:4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.11.009

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fatalla AA, Song K, Du T, Cao Y (2012) A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants. J Prosthodont 21:604–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00883.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dos Santos MB, Meloto GD, Bacchi A, Correr-Sobrinho L (2017) Stress distribution in cylindrical and conical implants under rotational micromovement with different boundary conditions and bone properties: 3-D FEA. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 20:893–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2017.1309394

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Toth A, Hasan I, Bourauel C, et al (2016) The influence of implant body and thread design of mini dental implants on the loading of surrounding bone : a finite element analysis. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2016-0002

Valente ML da C, de Castro DT, Shimano AC, et al (2015) Analysis of the influence of implant shape on primary stability using the correlation of multiple methods. Clin Oral Investig. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1417-4

Gehrke SA, da Silva UT, Del Fabbro M (2015) Does implant design affect implant primary stability ? A resonance frequency analysis based randomized split-mouth clinical trial. J Oral Implantol 41(6):281–286

Article  Google Scholar 

Brügger O, Bornstein M, Kuchler U et al (2015) Implant therapy in a surgical specialty clinic: an analysis of patients, indications, surgical procedures, risk factors, and early failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 30:151–160

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Eser A, Tonuk E, Akca K, Cehreli MC (2010) Predicting time-dependent remodeling of bone around immediately loaded dental implants with different designs. Med Eng Phys 32:22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.10.004

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee C, Lin S, Kang M et al (2010) Effects of implant threads on the contact area and stress distribution of marginal bone. J Dent Sci 5:156–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1991-7902(10)60023-2

Article  Google Scholar 

Shi L, Li H, Fok ASL, Ucer CC (2007) Shape Optimization of Dental Implants. 911–921

Geramizadeh M, Katoozian H, Amid R, Kadkhodazadeh M (2016) Static, dynamic, and fatigue finite element analysis of dental implants with different thread designs. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 26:347–355

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bordin D, Bergamo ETP, Fardin VP et al (2017) Fracture strength and probability of survival of narrow and extra-narrow dental implants after fatigue testing: in vitro and in silico analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 71:244–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.03.022

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ding X, Liao S, Zhu X et al (2008) Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 11(4):279–287

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kreve S, Ferreira I, da Costa Valente ML, dos Reis AC (2022) Relationship between dental implant macro-design and osseointegration: a systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-022-01116-4

Ríos-Santos JV, Menjívar-Galán AM, Herrero-Climent M, et al (2018) Unravelling the effect of macro and microscopic design of dental implants on osseointegration: a randomised clinical study in minipigs. J Mater Sci Mater Med 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-018-6101-1

Silva GA, Faot F, da Rosa Possebon AP et al (2021) Effect of macrogeometry and bone type on insertion torque, primary stability, surface topography damage and titanium release of dental implants during surgical insertion into artificial bone. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 119:104515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104515

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hingsammer L, Pommer B, Hunger S et al (2019) Influence of implant length and associated parameters upon biomechanical forces in finite element analyses: a systematic review. Implant Dent 28:296–305. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000879

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wu AY, Hsu J, Chee W et al (2016) ScienceDirect Biomechanical evaluation of one-piece and two-piece small-diameter dental implants : in-vitro experimental and three-dimensional finite element analyses. J Formos Med Assoc 115:794–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2016.01.002

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chang S, Huang S, Huang S, Lin C (2016) Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Mechanical response comparison in an implant overdenture retained by ball attachments on conventional regular and mini dental implants : a finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 19:911–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2015.1067687

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lima de Andrade C, Carvalho MA, Bordin D et al (2017) Biomechanical behavior of the dental implant macrodesign. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 32:264–270

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Meijer HJA, Kuiper JH, Starmans FJM, Bosman F (1992) Stress distribution around dental implants: influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. J Prosthet Dent 68:96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90293-J

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Himmlová L, Dostálová T, Kácovský A, Konvicková S (2004) Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 91:20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.008