Available online 28 June 2023, 101795
Histopathological classifications of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) change regularly and the latest WHO classification published in 2022, which concerns all NEN in the body, attempts to standardize classifications in the different locations. Differentiation and proliferation mainly assessed by Ki-67 index are still the cornerstone of those classifications. However, many markers are now used for diagnostic (to check neuroendocrine differentiation, to identify the site of origin of a metastasis, to help separating high-grade neuroendocrine tumors/NET and neuroendocrine carcinoma/NEC), prognostic or theranostic purposes. NENs are often heterogeneous and this can lead to difficulties in classifications, biomarker and prognostic assessment. These different points are discussed successively in this review, insisting especially on the frequent digestive, gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) localizations.
Section snippetsINTRODUCTIONThe classifications of digestive neuroendocrine tumors play a major role in the management of patients. They have evolved recently and this sometimes makes it difficult for clinicians to understand them.
Moreover, “classic” histological analysis alone is increasingly associated with the search for tissue biomarkers, whose diagnostic, prognostic and especially theranostic usefulness is very promising. It is still the beginning of the use of these markers, often restricted to a few specialized
Uncited reference[12]
REFERENCES (68)C. Woischke et al.In-depth mutational analyses of colorectal neuroendocrine carcinomas with adenoma or adenocarcinoma componentsModern Pathology
(2017)
W.M. Hackeng et al.Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine TumorsSurgical Pathology Clinics
(2022)
D. Dhall et al.Ki-67 proliferative index predicts progression-free survival of patients with well-differentiated ileal neuroendocrine tumorsHuman Pathology
(2012)
A. Couvelard et al.Heterogeneity of tumor prognostic markers: a reproducibility study applied to liver metastases of pancreatic endocrine tumorsModern Patholology
(2009)
R.V. Lloyd et al.WHO Classification of Tumours of Endocrine Organs(2017)
D. Lokuhetty et al.WHO Classification of Tumours of Digestive System(2019)
W.D. Travis et al.WHO Classification of Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart(2015)
W.D. Travis et al.WHO Classification of Thoracic Tumours(2022)
W.H.O. Classificationof Tumours Editorial BoardIn WHO classification of endocrine and neuroendocrine tumours(2022)
G. Rindi et al.Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Neuroendocrine NeoplasmsEndocrine Pathology
(2022)
M.S. Khan et al.A comparison of Ki-67 and mitotic count as prognostic markers for metastatic pancreatic and midgut neuroendocrine neoplasmsBritish Journal of Cancer
(2013)
A. Perren et al.ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Pathology: Diagnosis and Prognostic StratificationNeuroendocrinology
(2017)
S. Uccella et al.Immunohistochemical Biomarkers of Gastrointestinal, Pancreatic, Pulmonary, and Thymic Neuroendocrine NeoplasmsEndocrine Pathology
(2018)
R. Sakakibara et al.Insulinoma-associated Protein 1 (INSM1) Is a Better Marker for the Diagnosis and Prognosis Estimation of Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Than Neuroendocrine Phenotype Markers Such as Chromogranin A, Synaptophysin, and CD56American Journal of Surgical Pathology
(2020 Jun)
W. Su et al.Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is a novel immunohistochemical marker of neuroendocrine differentiationVirchows Archives
(2022)
A.M. BellizziSATB2 in neuroendocrine neoplasms: strong expression is restricted to well-differentiated tumours of lower gastrointestinal tract origin and is most frequent in Merkel cell carcinoma among poorly differentiated carcinomasHistopathology
(2020)
A. Couvelard et al.An update on the development of concepts, diagnostic criteria, and challenging issues for neuroendocrine neoplasms across different digestive organsVirchows Archives
(2022)
G. Hermann et al.Hormonally defined pancreatic and duodenal neuroendocrine tumors differ in their transcription factor signatures: expression of ISL1, PDX1, NGN3, and CDX2Virchows Archives
(2011)
Z. Yang et al.Immunohistochemical Characterization of the Origins of Metastatic Well-differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors to the LiverAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology
(2017)
R.T. Samdani et al.Loss of Menin Expression by Immunohistochemistry in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Comparison Between Primary and Metastatic TumorsPancreas
(2019)
L. de Mestier et al.Molecular deciphering of primary liver neuroendocrine neoplasms confirms their distinct existence with foregut-like profileJournal of Pathology
(2022)
J. Cros et al.Specific Genomic Alterations in High-Grade Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumours with Carcinoid MorphologyNeuroendocrinology.
(2021)
A. Kasajima et al.An analysis of 130 neuroendocrine tumors G3 regarding prevalence, origin, metastasis, and diagnostic featuresVirchows Archives
(2022)
A. Kasajima et al.Neuroendocrine tumor G3 of bronchopulmonary origin and its classificationPathology International
(2022)
View full text© 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Comments (0)