Background Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains one of the leading causes of early mortality after pediatric heart transplant (HT). While neurodevelopmental impacts of congenital heart disease (CHD) are well-characterized, the effect of PGD on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in pediatric HT recipients remains unknown. We sought to determine the association between PGD and neurodevelopmental outcomes in this population.

Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. All pediatric (age <18 years) isolated heart transplant recipients from 2010-2025 were included. The most recent pre- and post-transplant neurodevelopmental outcomes including cognitive delay, motor development, academic progress, and function status (stratified by age) were compared between PGD (n=434) and non-PGD groups (n=6956).

Results PGD patients had significantly worse pre-transplant functional status and motor development. Post-transplant, PGD was associated with worse motor development (18.8% vs. 13.0% definite motor delay; p=0.01) and functional status in younger children (39.5% vs. 57.8% able to keep up with peers; p<0.001). Post-transplant stroke occurred 3.5 times more frequently in PGD patients (11.5% vs. 3.3%; p<0.001). Cognitive development (p=0.94) and academic progress (p=0.09) did not differ significantly. Thirty-day (7.8% vs. 1.9%) and 1-year mortality (20.3% vs. 6.4%) were significantly higher in PGD patients (both p<0.001).

Conclusions This is the first study to characterize neurodevelopmental outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing HT with PGD. PGD is associated with significantly worse motor development and functional status independent of pre-transplant baseline. There is a 3.5-fold higher stroke rate providing a plausible neurological mechanism. The findings support targeted developmental surveillance recommendations and early intervention for this high-risk population.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Dr. Laura Seese received support from 2T32HL110849 - 11A1

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study used de-identified data from the UNOS database for which IRB/oversight was not required. This study was exempt from institutional review board approval as it utilized de-identified registry data and focused on quality improvement. The IRB is from the University of Pittsburgh and the ethical approval was waived.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data published in the article can be shared upon request.