Objectives Epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an emerging therapy for motor rehabilitation following spinal cord injury (SCI) and other motor disorders. Conventionally, SCS leads are placed along the dorsal spinal cord (SCSD), where stimulation activates large diameter afferent fibers, which indirectly activate motoneurons through reflex pathways. This leads to broad activation of flexor and extensor muscles and limited fine-tuned control of motor output. Targeting the ventral spinal cord (SCSV) may enable more direct activation of motoneuron pools, potentially improving the specificity of muscle activation; however, there is currently no established method to place leads ventrally. To address this, we evaluated the feasibility of four modified percutaneous implantation techniques to target the ventrolateral thoracolumbar spinal cord.

Materials and methods Percutaneous SCSV implantation was performed in three human cadaver torso specimens under fluoroscopic guidance. The following approaches were evaluated: sacral hiatus, transforaminal, interlaminar contralateral, and interlaminar ipsilateral. The leads in the latter 3 approaches were inserted between L1 and L5. Eighteen implants were attempted, with nine leads retained for analysis. Lead and electrode position were assessed using computed tomography (CT) with three-dimensional reconstruction, along with anatomical dissection to verify lead and electrode placement within the epidural space.

Results Successful ventral epidural lead placement was achieved using all four implantation approaches. The sacral hiatus (16/16 electrodes) and transforaminal (8/8 electrodes) approaches resulted in exclusively ventrolateral placement. The interlaminar contralateral approach led to 27/32 electrodes positioned ventrolaterally and 5/32 dorsally. The interlaminar ipsilateral implantation approach led to 14/32 electrodes positioned ventrolaterally and 18/32 positioned ventromedially.

Conclusions These findings demonstrate that ventral epidural SCS lead placement can be achieved using modified percutaneous implant techniques. The four approaches outlined here provide a clinically feasible pathway to SCSV and establishes a foundation for future clinical studies investigating SCSV for motor rehabilitation following SCI.

AMC consults with and received research grant funding from Stratus Medical LLC (paid directly to the University of Utah). ZLM serves on the Board of Directors of the International Pain and Spine Intervention Society (IPSIS), has research grant funding from Avanos Medical, Boston Scientific, DiscGenics, Presidio Medical, Saol Therapeutics, Spine Biopharma, SPR Therapeutics, Stratus Medical (paid directly to the University of Utah), and previous consultancies with Avanos Medical, Saol Therapeutics, Stryker, and OrthoSon (all relationships ended). PEK consults for Medtronic and has fiduciary ownership at Neurotargeting. TRB received research grant funding from DIROS technology (paid directly to the University of Utah) and reports consultancy with Avanos Medical. There are no other potential conflicts of interest to disclose on the part of any of the other authors.

Pilot funding from the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at the University of Utah

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Institutional Review Board at the University of Utah waived ethical approval for this work because it used cadaver specimens.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors