Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have shown increasing utility for risk stratification across complex diseases, but for psychiatric disorders such as bipolar disorder (BD), current PRS explain only a fraction of disorder liability (~1-9%), with predictive performance further diminished in non-European populations and real-world clinical cohorts. To explore the potential of integrating social and environmental risk factors alongside genetic liability to improve risk prediction, we evaluated the relationship between a PRS for BD (PRSBD) and six social risk measures - perceived stress, discrimination in medical settings, neighborhood social cohesion, perceived neighborhood disorder, cost-related medication nonadherence, and adverse childhood experiences - to BD case status in 115,275 participants (7,000 cases; 108,275 controls) from the All of Us Research Program. PRSBD was associated with BD case status across ancestry groups, though liability-scale variance explained was attenuated relative to what has been reported for curated research cohorts (R2 = 1.86% in European, 0.60% in African, 1.65% in Latino/Admixed American ancestries). Each social risk factor tested exhibited a larger effect size than PRSBD, with perceived stress (OR = 2.05 per SD) and adverse childhood experiences (OR = 2.68 for ≥4 ACEs) demonstrating the strongest associations. Individuals in the lowest genetic risk decile with high social burden exhibited BD prevalence comparable to or exceeding those in the highest genetic risk decile with low social burden. These findings demonstrate the substantial explanatory power of social risk factors and support the development of integrated genetic-social risk frameworks for more accurate and equitable psychiatric risk prediction.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study was funded by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE-2439854 awarded to R.R.S.

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The All of Us Research Program

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

This study used data from the All of Us Research Programs Controlled Tier Dataset version v8, available to authorized users on the Researcher Workbench. All analyses were done using Jupyter Notebooks and R on the All of Us workbench. Following controlled access registration and training, we will make our notebooks available upon request through the All of Us workbench.