Epigenetic Signatures in Monozygotic and Dizygotic Twins Discordant for Orofacial Clefts

Abstract

Introduction: Nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) is a common congenital malformation with complex etiology involving both genetic and environmental factors. Epigenetic mechanisms may mediate environmental contributions, but separating genetic from environmental effects remains challenging. Methods: We present an epigenome-wide association study with 32 monozygotic and 22 dizygotic twin pairs discordant for NSCL/P on blood and saliva samples. Differential methylation analysis was conducted using linear models to identify CpG sites showing significant methylation differences between affected and unaffected twins followed by functional annotation and pathway enrichment analysis. Results: The top-ranked finding is a differentially methylated region comprising two CpG sites at the CYP26A1 locus, cg12110262 (P = 3.21x10-7) and cg15055355 (P = 1.39x10-3). CYP26A1 is essential for retinoic acid catabolism and craniofacial patterning. The chromatin regulator ANKRD11, which causes KBG syndrome featuring cleft palate was the second best hit. Differentially methylated CpG sites showed significant enrichment in craniofacial enhancers and overlap with multiple GWAS-validated cleft genes including VAX1, PVRL1, SMAD3, and PRDM16. Conclusions: Our findings implicate retinoic acid signaling and chromatin regulation in NSCL/P etiology and demonstrate the value of discordant twin designs for distinguishing environmental from genetic epigenetic contributions to complex malformations.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, (grant number NIDCR K01DE027995, R37DE08559, U01DE020057, R01DE012472, R21DE016930, R01DE014667, R01DE028300).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

All samples were obtained in accordance with prior study protocols, following their respective approval by the University of Iowa and local Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), and with informed consent provided by participants, parents or guardians.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced will be made available online and are currently available upon reasonable request to the authors.

Comments (0)

No login
gif