Tham, Y.-C., Li, X., Wong, T.Y., et al., Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology, 2014. 121: p. 2081–2090.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Musch, D.C., Gillespie, B.W., Niziol, L.M., et al., Intraocular pressure control and long-term visual field loss in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study. Ophthalmology, 2011. 118: p. 1766–1773.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

De Moraes, C.G., Liebmann, J.M., Levin, L.A., Detection and measurement of clinically meaningful visual field progression in clinical trials for glaucoma. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 2017. 56: p. 107–147.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Weinreb, R.N., Aung, T., Medeiros, F.A., The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. JAMA, 2014. 311: p. 1901–1911.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chen, P.P., Blindness in patients with treated open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology, 2003. 110: p. 726–733.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Saunders, L.J., Russell, R.A., Kirwan, J.F., et al., Examining visual field loss in patients in glaucoma clinics during their predicted remaining lifetime. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2014. 55: p. 102.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hu, R., Wang, C., Gu, Y., Racette, L., Comparison of standard automated perimetry, short-wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency-doubling technology perimetry to monitor glaucoma progression. Medicine, 2016. 95: p. e2618.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Delgado, M.F., Nguyen, N.T.A., Cox, T.A., et al., Automated perimetry: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology, 2002. 109: p. 2362–2374.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Heijl, A., Lindgren, A., Lindgren, G., Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1989. 108: p. 130–135.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Scuderi, G., Fragiotta, S., Scuderi, L., et al., Ganglion cell complex analysis in glaucoma patients: what can it tell us? Eye and Brain, 2020. 12: p. 33–44.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Christopher, M., Bowd, C., Belghith, A., et al., Deep learning approaches predict glaucomatous visual field damage from OCT optic nerve head en face images and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness maps. Ophthalmology, 2020. 127: p. 346–356.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lazaridis, G., Montesano, G., Afgeh, S.S., et al., Predicting visual fields from optical coherence tomography via an ensemble of deep representation learners. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 2022. 238: p. 52–65.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim, D., Seo, S.B., Park, S.J., Cho, H.-K., Deep learning visual field global index prediction with optical coherence tomography parameters in glaucoma patients. Scientific Reports, 2023. 13: p. 18304.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mahmoudinezhad, G., Mohammadzadeh, V., Martinyan, J., et al., Comparison of ganglion cell layer and ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer measures for detection of early glaucoma. Ophthalmology Glaucoma, 2023. 6: p. 58–67.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mohammadzadeh, V., Vepa, A., Li, C., et al., Prediction of central visual field measures from macular OCT volume scans with deep learning. Translational Vision Science & Technology, 2023. 12: p. 5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kihara, Y., Montesano, G., Chen, A., et al., Policy-driven, multimodal deep learning for predicting visual fields from the optic disc and OCT imaging. Ophthalmology, 2022. 129: p. 781–791.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chen, Z., Shemuelian, E., Wollstein, G., et al., Segmentation-free OCT-volume-based deep learning model improves pointwise visual field sensitivity estimation. Translational Vision Science & Technology, 2023. 12: p. 28.

Article  Google Scholar 

Maurício, J., Domingues, I., Bernardino, J., Comparing vision transformers and convolutional neural networks for image classification: a literature review. Applied Sciences, 2023. 13: p. 5521.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., et al., An image is worth 16×16 words: transformers for image recognition at scale. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021. p. 45–67

Yang, Y., Cai, Z., Qiu, S., Xu, P., Vision transformer with masked autoencoders for referable diabetic retinopathy classification based on large-size retina image. PLoS One, 2024. 19: p. e0299265.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wang, D., Lian, J., Jiao, W., Multi-label classification of retinal disease via a novel vision transformer model. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2023. 17: p. 1290803.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J., Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016. p. 770–778.

Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A., Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. International Conference on Learning Representations, 2015. p. 1–14

Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., et al., Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016. p. 2818–2826.

Tan, M., Le, Q., EfficientNet: rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. International Conference on Machine Learning, 2019. p. 6105–6114

Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., Weinberger, K.Q., Densely connected convolutional networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018. : p. 4700–4708

Xu, W., Fu, Y.L., Zhu, D., ResNet and its application to medical image processing: research progress and challenges. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2023. 240: p. 107660.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Khan, S.H., Naseer, M., Hayat, M., Zamir, S.W., Khan, F.S., Shah, M., Transformers in vision: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 2022.

Touvron, H., Cord, M., Douze, M., et al., Training data-efficient image transformers and distillation through attention. International Conference on Machine Learning, 2021. : p. 10347–10357

Shao, K., Wang, X., Jiang, H., BEIT-based and feature extraction unsupervised clustering algorithm for wafer patterns. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2024. 2851: p. 012021.

Google Scholar 

Kim, H., Lee, J., Moon, S., et al., Visual field prediction using a deep bidirectional gated recurrent unit network model. Scientific Reports, 2023. 13: p. 11154.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tiang, J., Vingrys, A.J., Lin, S., et al., Multi-centre comparison between device-independent web-browser perimetry (Melbourne Rapid Fields-web) and SITA-Faster for glaucoma. Frontiers in Ophthalmology, 2025. 5. :p. 1485950

Porciatti, V., Bosse, B., Parekh, P.K., et al., Adaptation of the steady-state PERG in early glaucoma. Journal of Glaucoma, 2014. 23: p. 494–500.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pham, Q.T.M., Han, J.C., Park, D.Y., Shin, J., Multimodal deep learning model of predicting future visual field for glaucoma patients. IEEE Access, 2023. 11: p. 19049–19058.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhu, H., Crabb, D.P., Schlottmann, P.G., et al., Predicting visual function from the measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer structure. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2010. 51: p. 5657.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zeiler, M.D., Fergus, R., Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks. Computer Vision – ECCV 2014. vol 8689, 2014. : p. 818–833

Mwanza, J.-C., Budenz, D.L., Warren, J.L., et al., Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness floor and corresponding functional loss in glaucoma. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2015. 99: p. 732–737.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wollstein, G., Kagemann, L., Bilonick, R.A., et al., Retinal nerve fibre layer and visual function loss in glaucoma: the tipping point. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2012. 96: p. 47–52.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moghimi, S., Bowd, C., Zangwill, L.M., et al., Measurement floors and dynamic ranges of OCT and OCT angiography in glaucoma. Ophthalmology, 2019. 126: p. 980–988.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Geevarghese, A., Wollstein, G., Ishikawa, H., Schuman, J.S., Optical coherence tomography and glaucoma. Annual Review of Vision Science, 2021. 7: p. 693–726.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chen, L., Chen, J., Hajimirsadeghi, H., Mori, G., Adapting Grad-CAM for embedding networks. IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, 2020. : p. 2783–2792.

Sangchocanonta, S., Ingpochai, S., Puangarom, S., et al., Donut: augmentation technique for enhancing the efficacy of glaucoma suspect screening. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2023. p. 1–5.

Jonas, J.B., Weber, P., Nagaoka, N., Ohno-Matsui, K., Glaucoma in high myopia and parapapillary delta zone. PLoS One, 2017. 12: p. e0175120.