Acute Traumatic Subdural Hematomas—When (and Why) Do We Stop? The aSDH-stop Survey

 SFX Search Buy Article(opens in new window) Permissions and Reprints(opens in new window) Article preview thumbnailAbstract Objective

This study investigates the decision-making process among neurosurgeons regarding the surgical management of acute subdural hematomas (aSDH), focusing on the role of non-classical Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) factors such as brainstem reflexes, hypocoagulation, and patient comorbidity, alongside traditional guidelines.

Methods

We conducted an international survey that presented neurosurgeons with real-case scenarios, designed to assess the impact of both traditional and non-traditional prognostic indicators on their surgical decisions. The survey also collected demographic data to examine potential correlations with decision-making preferences.

Results

The survey garnered 67 responses from neurosurgeons across 22 countries, revealing a reliance on non-classical BTF factors in decision-making for aSDH cases with a potentially poor prognosis. No significant correlations were found between these decision-making practices and the surgeons' demographic characteristics.

Conclusion

The findings highlight the complexity and nuanced nature of surgical decision-making in aSDH management, underlining the importance of non-traditional prognostic factors. The results advocate for further research to refine clinical guidelines, ensuring they encapsulate the breadth of factors considered in practice, thereby enhancing patient-centered care.

Keywords subdural hematomas - brain trauma - traumatic brain injury - neurotrauma Publication History

Received: 09 November 2024

Accepted: 13 March 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
18 March 2025

Article published online:
14 November 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Comments (0)

No login
gif