This study investigates the decision-making process among neurosurgeons regarding the surgical management of acute subdural hematomas (aSDH), focusing on the role of non-classical Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) factors such as brainstem reflexes, hypocoagulation, and patient comorbidity, alongside traditional guidelines.
MethodsWe conducted an international survey that presented neurosurgeons with real-case scenarios, designed to assess the impact of both traditional and non-traditional prognostic indicators on their surgical decisions. The survey also collected demographic data to examine potential correlations with decision-making preferences.
ResultsThe survey garnered 67 responses from neurosurgeons across 22 countries, revealing a reliance on non-classical BTF factors in decision-making for aSDH cases with a potentially poor prognosis. No significant correlations were found between these decision-making practices and the surgeons' demographic characteristics.
ConclusionThe findings highlight the complexity and nuanced nature of surgical decision-making in aSDH management, underlining the importance of non-traditional prognostic factors. The results advocate for further research to refine clinical guidelines, ensuring they encapsulate the breadth of factors considered in practice, thereby enhancing patient-centered care.
Keywords subdural hematomas - brain trauma - traumatic brain injury - neurotrauma Publication HistoryReceived: 09 November 2024
Accepted: 13 March 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
18 March 2025
Article published online:
14 November 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Comments (0)