Accelerometer-Derived Physical Activity Volume, Not Pattern, Correlates with Reduced Gout Incidence in a UK Prospective Cohort

Abstract

Background The role of physical activity (PA) patterns in gout prevention remains unclear. This prospective study investigated associations between accelerometer-derived PA patterns, specifically “regularly active” (RA) and “weekend warrior” (WW), and incident gout.

Methods Among 97,474 gout-free UK Biobank participants with valid 7-day accelerometer data obtained using Axivity AX3 wrist-based triaxial devices, we categorized PA patterns as Inactive (<150 min/week moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA]), WW (≥150 min MVPA with ≥50% concentrated in 1–2 days) and RA (≥150 min MVPA, not meeting WW criteria). Multivariable Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for incident gout.

Results Over a median follow-up of 8.0 years, 905 incident gout cases occurred. Compared to the Inactive group (n=36,785), both RA (n=20,298; HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62–0.91, P=0.004) and WW (n=40,391; HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73–0.98, P=0.024) showed significantly reduced gout risk in fully adjusted models. Crucially, after additional adjustment for total MVPA volume, no significant difference in gout risk was observed between RA and WW across models (all P>0.3). Inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses confirmed these associations (RA vs. Inactive: HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62–0.93, P=0.007; WW vs. Inactive: HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.72–0.99, P=0.039). Stratification by gout polygenic risk score tertiles showed consistent protective effects for both RA and WW patterns across all genetic risk strata (all P-interaction >0.1). Sensitivity analyses (varying MVPA thresholds, stricter WW definitions [≥75% MVPA in 1-2 days], excluding early gout cases) supported the robustness of the findings.

Conclusion Physical activity, including both regularly active and weekend warrior patterns, was associated with significantly reduced gout risk. Physical activity volume, rather than its temporal pattern, drives the reduction in gout risk. When achieving equivalent MVPA volume, no significant difference exists between regularly active and weekend warrior patterns. The protective role of physical activity was consistent under different subgroups and genetic risk profiles, supporting its potential as a broadly applicable strategy for gout prevention.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The work was supported by the General Project of the Medical and Health of Zhejiang Province (2024KY037), the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Zhejiang Province Co-Construction Project (GZY-ZJ-KJ-23002), the Postdoctoral Research Start-up Fund of Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (C-2024-BSH15) and the Talent Recruitment Fund for Outstanding Doctoral Graduates of Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (C-2024-BS20).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This work employs data from UK Biobank (Application ID 545732), a population-scale biomedical database. Access requires registration and approval through the institutional access portal at www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/register-apply.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Comments (0)

No login
gif