Introduction: Trunk control and seated balance are important for various activities of daily living in patients with spinal cord injuries (SCI). A clinically appropriate and reliable gold standard seated balance outcome measure for SCI is lacking. The Function in Sitting Test (FIST) has become popular in stroke and in-patient clinics for tracking seated balance. A modified version of the Function in Sitting Test for SCI patients may prove similarly useful for measuring and tracking seated balance in the clinic. Objective. The primary objective of this study was to modify the FIST for the SCI population (mFIST) and assess initial reliability of the measure in a busy outpatient, real world, clinical setting. The secondary objective was to determine trends in scoring differences if reliability was below excellent. Design. Prospective reliability study. The mFIST was administered to Veterans with SCI twice within 2 weeks by the same evaluator, while being video recorded for subsequent scoring. Setting. Busy Outpatient Clinic in Veteran Affairs Healthcare System. Participants. A total of 42 Veterans with SCI (mean age = 62, 91% male), between C4 to L1 and with an American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade of A to D, participated in this study during routine outpatient clinic. Participants had to be primary wheelchair users and able to sit unsupported for at least 1 min. Interventions. Not Applicable. Main Outcome Measures. Test retest, intra rater and inter rater reliability using intra class correlation coefficients were determined. Mean rating differences were calculated for individual mFIST items, total scores across all subjects, and when separated by SCI injury level grouping to investigate reliability trends. Results. Test retest and intra rater reliability for the mFIST for the entire cohort were good with ICCs of 0.88 (CI: 0.77, 0.93) and 0.89 (CI: 0.51, 0.97), respectively. Inter rater reliability was excellent with ICC = 0.92 (CI: 0.85, 0.96) across the entire cohort, however reliability dropped (0.78; p= 0.02) for certain SCI subgroups. The largest differences in scoring across reliability testing were seen during dynamic tasks in those with cervical injuries. Conclusion. The mFIST displays good to excellent reliability and face validity overall during routine use in a busy outpatient clinic. Inconsistencies in scoring of some of the dynamic items, however, indicate that the measure might need further wording and/or scoring refinements before being widely distributed. Determining the validity and sensitivity of the mFIST is also needed. Key words: Modified FIST, balance outcome, seated balance

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study was supported by the Paralyzed Veterans of America grant #3168. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the Paralyzed Veterans of America Foundation.

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Long Beach VA Medical Center's Institutional Review Board approved this study.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data produced in this study is available upon reasonable request and after approved by the Long Beach VA.