Trust in data sharing reflects the contextuality of the trustor-trustee relationship

Abstract

It is widely recognized that trust is an essential element in how people engage with data sharing and underpins efforts to use data to improve care quality and understand population-level health trends, and consequently improve health inequalities. However, research into public trust in the data sharing and healthcare settings may rely on oversimplified notions of what trust entails, and what is involved in trusting relationships in this setting has not been widely explored. Relatedly, the way that trust manifests as a function of perceived trustworthiness is unestablished. Here, we analyze data from 2000 participants who completed a questionnaire about how they place trust in entities including family, the healthcare system, and corporations when it comes to their personal health data. We find that the reasons people place trust differ depending on the relationship and circumstance, and suggest that trustworthiness is an underlying quality that manifests and is perceived differently under different conditions. Future work into trust relationships should account for this varying presentation of trust, and perceptions of trustworthiness, when it comes to exploration of relationships between people, institutions, and systems.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Yes

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Not Applicable

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study received research ethics approval at the Faculty of Education at the University of Cambridge in July 2022. Consent was obtained online.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Not Applicable

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Not Applicable

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Not Applicable

Comments (0)

No login
gif