Extreme fatigue is a clinical symptom that affects >50% of individuals with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), with a similar prevalence across many common immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). Despite its ubiquity, human scientific studies have yet to explain the mechanistic basis of this pervasive and complex symptom. One fundamental reason for this, is our inability to account for the clinical heterogeneity of fatigue with its multifactorial nature. We present the conceptual machine learning (ML) framework to dissect the complex nature of fatigue using one of the largest prospectively captured, real-world patient-reported outcome (PROs) on wellbeing from three contemporaneous cohorts (2020-present), totalling 2,970 responses from 2,290 participants across the UK and internationally, including non-IBD controls with 100 lines of clinical metadata. We systematically defined the (1) threshold of fatigue as our primary outcome (≥10/14 fatigue days) to build our ML approach, (2) utilised routinely available clinical data that can be used at a population-level analysis, (3) employed seven different ML methods with external validation in 3 different cohorts in UK, Spain and Australia (n=252), (4) employed Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis to break down the clinical heterogeneity to allow the examination of clinical predictive factors at an individual level; and finally (5), investigate whether there are distinct clusters of fatigue patients. We found that ML models performed comparably (AUC/C-index ∼0.7) on external validation with SHAP analysis showing interpretable, individualised fatigue drivers and five distinct fatigue phenotypes, including a subgroup of young males with significantly lower fatigue burden. Our data therefore provides the ML ‘roadmap’ to predict and deconstruct fatigue in IBD and potentially also more widely in IMIDs, enabling patient-level dissection beyond symptom-based classification with the ability to integrate deep molecular data. This is a step towards future clinical-scientific AI models with the immediate clinical application to stratify patients to human experimental studies to better understand the dominant mechanisms that drive fatigue at an individual level.
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocolshttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04760964
Funding StatementThis work is part of the MUSIC IBD study funded by The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (G-1911-03343) and Anne Ferguson Memorial Fund to GTH.
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Investigation into Gastrointestinal Damage Associated Molecular Patterns (GI-DAMPs) is a cross-sectional IBD study with ethical approvals by East Scotland Ethics Committee REC 18/ES/0090 and R&D 2018/0197. Mitochondrial DAMPs as mechanistic biomarkers of mucosal inflammation in Crohn's Disease (MUSIC study; www.musicstudy.uk) is a prospective IBD cohort study with ethical approvals by East Scotland Ethics Committee REC 19/ES/0087 and R&D No: 2019/0325.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Comments (0)