Introduction Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after cardiac surgery is a significant concern. Despite the known association between acute pain and CPSP, advanced pain management strategies have not reduced its incidence. Preventing CPSP requires optimizing acute pain control and disrupting central sensitization. The side effects and risks associated with chronic use of current opioid-based cardiac anesthesia necessitate the adoption of multimodal analgesia. Regional anesthesia is a promising alternative, though existing techniques in cardiac surgery have notable limitations. The intertransverse process block (ITPB) is a novel regional technique that offers potential somatic and visceral analgesia. Recent studies demonstrate consistent local anesthetic spread to the intercostal, paravertebral, and epidural spaces, suggesting broader pain control. ITPB may provide a simpler, safer approach in cardiac surgery, reducing the risks of pleural puncture and bleeding. We hypothesize that ITPB will improve pain control, quality of recovery, and health-related quality of life, thereby mitigating chronic postsurgical pain.

Methods This is a single-center, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial with intention-to-treat analysis. Elective patients awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting, with or without valvular repair or replacement, will be recruited. Ninety-six participants will be randomly assigned to either ITPB or control group. The ITPB group will receive bilateral ITPBs with 20 ml 0.25% levobupivacaine on each side at the T4-5 level under ultrasound guidance, administered before anesthesia induction. Sham blocks, with equal volume of normal saline, will be performed in the control group. The primary outcome is the quality of recovery, assessed using the 15-item Quality of Recovery questionnaire, at 24 hours after tracheal extubation. Secondary outcomes include Numerical Rating Scale pain scores, patient satisfaction, and opioid consumption within 72 hours post-extubation, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the ICU and hospital, and opioid-related side effects. The incidence of CPSP at 3, 6, and 12 months will be measured, along with pain interference via the Brief Pain Inventory and the Short-Form McGill Questionnaire-2.

Discussion Current pain management strategies often rely heavily on opioids, which can have significant side effects and may not adequately address chronic postsurgical pain. This study investigates the efficacy of the intertransverse process block, a novel regional anesthesia technique, in reducing both acute and chronic postsurgical pain in cardiac surgery. Randomized controlled trials on intertransverse process block in cardiac surgery are limited. The results of this study will help define the role of intertransverse process block in reducing chronic postsurgical pain in cardiac surgical population.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

NCT06946290

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong-New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee CREC Ref. No.: 2025.177-T

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Funding: This research received no specific grant funding. This trial will be supported by the Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Competing interests: None declared

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion.