Background Hypospadias affects 1 in 150-300 male births and requires surgical correction. Optimal regional anesthesia technique selection is crucial for pain management in these pediatric procedures.

Objective To compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of caudal epidural (CB), dorsal penile nerve (DPNB), and pudendal nerve blocks (PNB) in children undergoing hypospadias repair surgery.

Evidence Review We conducted a systematic review by searching through PubMed, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and clinical trial registries for randomized controlled trials on 26 November 2024. Studies comparing dorsal penile nerve (DPNB), or pudendal nerve blocks (PNB) and caudal epidural Block (CB) in children with hypospadias were included. RevMan v5.4. was used to conduct two pairwise meta-analyses, pooling dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool.

Findings Ten randomized trials (768 patients: CB=337, DPNB=173, PNB=169) were included. Six studies had some concerns for bias, no studies were identified as carrying a high risk of bias. PNB demonstrated significantly lower pain scores compared to CB at 6 hours (SMD: -0.50 with 95% CI [-0.77, -0.23], P=0.0003), 12 hours (SMD: -1.95 with 95% CI [-3.29, -0.61], P=0.004), and 24 hours (SMD: -1.20 with 95% CI [-2.29, -0.11], P=0.03) with reduced analgesic consumption (RR: 0.23 with 95% CI [0.05, 0.99], P= 0.05). No significant differences in pain scores were found between DPNB and CB. DPNB was associated with decreased hypotension compared to CB (RR: 0.27 [95% CI: 0.08, 0.93], P=0.04).

Conclusions For pediatric hypospadias repair, PNB provides superior postoperative analgesia compared to CB, while DPNB offers comparable pain control with improved hemodynamic stability. Regional block selection should balance analgesic efficacy with safety profile. More clinical trials that provide homogenous and no biased data is needed.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study did not receive any funding

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript