Splanchnic Vein Doppler After LVAD Implantation: A Bedside Tool for Guiding Decongestion and Organ Recovery

Abstract

Background Noninvasive, physiology-based methods to monitor systemic venous congestion and guide volume management early after durable LVAD implantation are lacking. We investigated whether changes in portal, hepatic, and renal vein Doppler flow patterns correlate with net fluid balance and whether these changes are associated with renal function and right ventricular (RV) performance in this setting. Methods In this prospective, proof-of-concept observational study at a national referral center for mechanical circulatory support, we enrolled 20 adult patients undergoing durable LVAD implantation between June 2024 and May 2025. Each patient underwent splanchnic venous Doppler ultrasound (hepatic, portal, and renal veins) and focused echocardiography at two time points: early after ICU admission (T0) and within 7 days (T1), post-implantation. Clinical, biochemical, and device parameters were recorded at each time point. Doppler findings were available to treating physicians and could inform real-time decisions; however, no predefined Doppler-guided protocol was applied. Results Patients experienced a significant negative fluid balance (median=-6034 mL; IQR:8145 to 3476), which was accompanied by consistent improvement in venous Doppler profiles and a significant reduction in VExUS score (p < 0.001). Changes in portal and renal vein Doppler patterns correlated with net fluid balance (rho=0.45, p=0.046 and rho=0.68, p=0.001, respectively). A trend was also observed between VExUS change and fluid balance (rho=0.45, p=0.053). Renal function improved significantly, with an increase in eGFR (p=0.033), and right ventricular function showed parallel recovery: RV systolic velocity (S) increased (p=0.001), RV dilation regressed (p=0.008), and tricuspid regurgitation grade decreased (p=0.001). Conclusions Point-of-care Doppler assessment of splanchnic venous flow is feasible early after LVAD implantation and reflects dynamic changes in fluid balance, renal function, and RV performance. These findings suggest that venous Doppler ultrasound may provide a physiologic, bedside method to guide decongestive therapy in this complex population, warranting validation in larger, protocol-driven studies.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

Not applicable. This was a prospective observational study without randomization of participant or any interventional component, and therefore registration in a clinical trial registry was not required. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center

Funding Statement

This work received no funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center (Approval No. 809/06.06.2024), and all participants or their legal surrogates provided written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Comments (0)

No login
gif