Clinical Efficacy of “Modified Clavien Grading Classification” for Analysis of Post PCNL Complications: Ambispective Study from a Single-Center Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

Johnson CM, Wilson DM, O’Fallon WM, Malek RS, Kurland LT (1979) Renal stone epidemiology: a 25-year study in Rochester. Minnesota Kidney Int 16(5):624–631

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kinn AC, Fernstróm I, Johansson B, Ohlsén H (1991) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy–the birth of a new technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 138:11–14

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111(5):518–526

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 250(2):187–96. 28.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Graefen M (2010) The modified Clavien system: a plea for a standardized reporting system for surgical complications. Eur Urol 57(3):387–389

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

de la Rosette JJMCH, Zuazu JR, Tsakiris P, Elsakka AM, Zudaire JJ, Laguna MP (2008) Prognostic factors and percutaneous nephrolithotomy morbidity: a multivariate analysis of a contemporary series using the Clavien classification. J Urol. 180(6):2489–93.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tefekli A, Karadag MA, Tepeler K, Sari E, Berberoglu Y, Baykal M et al (2008) Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified Clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 53(1):184–190

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zuazu JR, Hruza M, Rassweiler JJ, de la Rosette JJMCH (2010) The Clavien classification system to optimize the documentation of PCNL morbidity. Arch Ital UrolAndrol Organo Uff Soc Ital EcogrUrol E Nefrol. 82(1):20–2.

Google Scholar 

Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Graefen M, Remzi M, Rouprêt M, Truss M (2012) Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. Eur Urol 61(2):341–349

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Labate G, Modi P, Timoney A, Cormio L, Zhang X, Louie M et al (2011Aug) The percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: classification of complications. J Endourol 25(8):1275–1280

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Singh I, Saran RN, Jain M (2008) Does sealing of the tract with absorbable gelatin (Spongostan) facilitate tubeless PCNL? A prospective study J Endourol 22(11):2485–2493. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0321. (PMID: 18928387)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ghani KR, Sammon JD, Bhojani N, Karakiewicz PI, Sun M, Sukumar S et al (2013) Trends in percutaneous nephrolithotomy use and outcomes in the United States. J Urol 190(2):558–564.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Okeke Z, Smith AD, Labate G, D’Addessi A, Venkatesh R, Assimos D et al (2012) Prospective comparison of outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients versus younger patients. J Endourol 26(8):996–1001

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, Gutierrez J, Lingeman J, Scarpa R et al (2011) The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society PCNL Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol 25(1):11–17

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moreno-Palacios J, Maldonado-Alcaraz E, Montoya-Martínez G, Rivas-Ruiz R, Cedillo-López U, Okhunov Z et al (2014) Prognostic factors of morbidity in patients undergoing PCNL. J Endourol 28(9):1078–1084

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Falahatkar S, Moghaddam KG, Kazemnezhad E, Farzan A, Aval HB, Ghasemi A et al (2015) Factors affecting complications according to the modified Clavien classification in complete supine PCNL. Can Urol Assoc J 9(1–2):e83

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fuller A, Razvi H, Denstedt JD, Nott L, Pearle M, Cauda F, Bolton D, Celia A, De La Rosette J, CROES PCNL Study Group (2012Jul 1) The CROES percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: the influence of body mass index on outcome. J Urol. 188(1):138–44.

Basnet RB, Shrestha A, Shrestha PM, Joshi BR (2018) Risk factors for postoperative complications after PCNL. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 13;16(1):79–83.

Hu H, Lu Y, Cui L, Zhang J, Zhao Z, Qin B et al (2016) Impact of previous open renal surgery on the outcomes of subsequent PCNL: a metaanalysis. BMJ Open 6(4):e010627

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Khorrami M, Hadi M, Sichani MM, Nourimahdavi K, Yazdani M, Alizadeh F, et al. PCNL success rate and complications in patients with previous open stone surgery. Urol 2014:8;11(3):1557–62.

D’Costa MR, Haley WE, Mara KC, Enders FT, Vrtiska TJ, Pais VM et al (2019) Symptomatic and radiographic manifestations of kidney stone recurrence and their prediction by risk factors: a prospective cohort study. J Am Soc Nephrol 30(7):1251–1260

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Olbert PJ, Hegele A, Schrader AJ, Scherag A, Hofmann R. Pre- and perioperative predictors of short-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCNL. Urol Res. 2007 27;35(5):225–30.

Shin TS, Cho HJ, Hong SH, Lee JY, Kim SW, Hwang TK. Complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy classified by the modified Clavien grading system: a single center’s experience over 16 years. Korean J Urol2011; 17;52(11):769–775.

Kumar S, Keshavamurthy R, Karthikeyan VS, Mallya A (2017) Complications after prone PCNL in pediatric, adult and geriatric patients–a single center experience over 7 years. Int Braz J Urol 43(4):704–712

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mazzon G, Choong S, Celia A (2023Jul 1) Stone-scoring systems for predicting complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review of the literature. Asian Journal of Urology 10(3):226–238

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Soares RM, Zhu A, Talati VM, Nadler RB (2019Dec) Upper pole access for prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: advantage or risk? Urology 1(134):66–71

Article  Google Scholar 

Honey RJ, Wiesenthal JD, Ghiculete D, Pace S, Ray AA, Pace KT (2011Jun 1) Comparison of supracostal versus infracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the novel prone-flexed patient position. J Endourol 25(6):947–954

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nouralizadeh A, Ziaee SA, Hosseini Sharifi SH, Basiri A, Tabibi A, Sharifiaghdas F, Kilani H, Gharaei B, Roodneshin F, Soltani MH (2013Aug 1) Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under spinal versus general anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol 27(8):974–978

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De La Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP, Giusti G, Serrano A, Kandasami SV, Wolf Jr JS, Grabe M, Gravas S, Croes Pcnl Study Group. Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. European urology. 2012 Aug 1;62(2):246–55.

Mandal S, Goel A, Kathpalia R, Sankhwar S, Singh V, Sinha RJ, Singh BP, Dalela D (2012Oct 1) Prospective evaluation of complications using the modified Clavien grading system, and of success rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using Guy’s stone score: a single-center experience. Indian Journal of Urology 28(4):392–398

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif