Available online 20 February 2024
Historically, KRAS has been considered ‘undruggable’ inspite of being one of the most frequently altered oncogenic proteins in solid tumors, primarily due to the paucity of pharmacologically ‘druggable’ pockets within the mutant isoforms. However, pioneering developments in drug design capable of targeting the mutant KRAS isoforms especially KRASG12C-mutant cancers, have opened the doors for emergence of combination therapies comprising of a plethora of inhibitors targeting different signaling pathways. SHP2 signaling pathway, primarily known for activation of intracellular signaling pathways such as KRAS has come up as a potential target for such combination therapies as it emerged to be the signaling protein connecting KRAS and the immune signaling pathways and providing the link for understanding the overlapping regions of RAS/ERK/MAPK signaling cascade. Thus, SHP2 inhibitors having potent tumoricidal activity as well as role in immunomodulation have generated keen interest in researchers to explore its potential as combination therapy in KRAS mutant solid tumors. However, the excitement with these combination therapies need to overcome challenges thrown up by drug resistance and enhanced toxicity. In this review, we will discuss KRAS and SHP2 signaling pathways and their roles in immunomodulation and regulation of tumor microenvironment and also analyze the positive effects and drawbacks of the different combination therapies targeted at these signaling pathways along with their present and future potential to treat solid tumors.
Section snippetsRAS signaling pathway and its brief biological activity and importance in solid tumorsRas is a small guanosine triphosphate (GTPase), ubiquitously expressed in all cells, and a member of the G protein (guanine nucleotide binding protein) family (Chen, Zhang, Qian, & Wang, 2021). GTPases are prime regulators that adds or removes a phosphate group to transmit signals within the cell by switching from an active (GTP) to inactive (GDP) state and vice versa (Chen et al., 2021). This activity of Ras is mainly regulated by three crucial factors: Guanosine nucleotide dissociation
KRAS structure and functionKRAS is the most frequently mutated Ras isoform in humans and is fatally associated with solid tumors such as nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal cancer (CRC) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (Yang, Zhang, Huang, & Chu, 2023). KRAS homologue was first identified in human lung cancer cells and was located on the short arm of chromosome 12 (12p11.1–12p12.1) (McBride et al., 1983). The KRAS gene generates two similar protein isoforms, KRAS-4B and KRAS-4A, due to the splice
KRAS signaling in health and diseaseKRAS protein with a molecular mass of 23.2 kDa, performs as the first trigger for the intracellular signaling pathways. In human cells, KRAS4B is profoundly expressed compared to KRAS4A, which has weaker expression (Jančík, Drábek, Radzioch, & Hajdúch, 2010). Protein tyrosine kinase receptors in healthy condition, triggers and activates the KRAS signaling pathways, by binding to the ligands and inducing oligomerization of the receptor (Lemmon & Schlessinger, 2010). PTPN11 encoding SHP2, is a
KRAS mutant solid tumorsWild type KRAS is a tumor suppressor gene and is frequently found to mutated during tumor progression in many cancers (Jančík et al., 2010). KRAS mutations are predominantly found in NSCLC, CRC, PDAC, Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma, and Endometrial Cancer (Indini et al., 2021).
KRAS inhibitorsThe high incidence of occurrence and lack of drug binding pocket makes KRAS one of the most studied and challenging therapeutic targets. Typically, patients with KRAS-mutant solid tumors were treated with conventional chemotherapy, where median PFS of CRC patients was 11.6 months, and OS for NSCLC patients was approximately 2 years (Ceddia et al., 2022, Zocche et al., 2015).
Immunotherapy and targeted therapy are combinedly under research by scientists to effectively inhibit KRAS and its
KRAS targeted resistanceAcquired resistance can occur for reasons such as de novo mutations, enhanced autophagy, feedback mechanisms of associated effectors. There are two key mechanisms responsible for resistance against KRAS inhibitors: intrinsic resistance and acquired resistance.
KRAS and SHP2 pathways linked with immunomodulation and TMEThe TME comprises of diverse range of cells- tumor cells, matrix-associated cells and immune cells. As our understanding of the TME continues to evolve, it becomes evident that comprehending the microenvironment extends beyond immune cells and tumor cells alone; it is crucial to also grasp their intercommunication. The intrinsic mechanisms of tumor cells can effectively orchestrate interactions between tumor cells and immune cells, thereby reshaping the tumor immune environment. This process
Structure and biological function of SHP2Src homology phosphatase 2 (SHP2), a protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP), is encoded by PTPN11 and plays a key role in the activation of intracellular signaling pathways such as KRAS pathway. SHP2 has two SH2 domains (N-SH2 and C-SH2), a protein-tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) domain, and a C-terminal domain with two tyrosine residues (Fedele et al., 2020). The tyrosine residues are the phosphorylation site, such as tyrosine 542 and 580, and acts as a binding site GRB2-SOS1 complex and recruits it to
Combination of SHP2 inhibitors with other drugs in modulating KRAS driven solid tumoursSHP2i are also being tested with various combinations of drugs and inhibitors are being tested in several tumors which show hyperactivity of the RAS/ERK pathway. The immune-modulatory effects of SHP2is can be characterized systematically in genetically defined, immune- competent indigenous or orthotopic tumor models that resemble closely to human cancers might provide important insights into judicious combination of these agents. Many such combination therapies under clinical trials and active
Future directionsSafety and efficacy pose the biggest challenge in the use of SHP2i as a monotherapy or as part of a combination regimen more so because SHP2is are not well tolerated on their own. As such, evaluation of SHP2is have been done in a number of schedules to improve its tolerability such as: one big dose once per week; two days on followed by several days off;or three days on, 4 days off; or even two weeks on, one week off.” The current scenario still depicts that the combination strategy results in
References (258)P. Froesch et al.Binimetinib, pemetrexed and cisplatin, followed by maintenance of binimetinib and pemetrexed in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and KRAS mutations. The phase 1B SAKK 19/16 trialLung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
(2021)
A. Fukuda et al.Stat3 and MMP7 contribute to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma initiation and progressionCancer Cell
(2011)
A.S. Fung et al.A phase I study of binimetinib (MEK 162), a MEK inhibitor, plus carboplatin and pemetrexed chemotherapy in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancerLung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
(2021)
R. Govindan et al.446PD—Phase I study of AMG 510, a novel molecule targeting KRAS G12C mutant solid tumoursAnnals of Oncology
(2019)
J.B. Haanen et al.NKG2A, a new kid on the immune checkpoint blockCell
(2018)
C.S.L. Ho et al.HER2 mediates clinical resistance to the KRAS(G12C) inhibitor sotorasib, which is overcome by co-targeting SHP2.European Journal of Cancer
(2021)
R. Holmer et al.Interleukin-6: A villain in the drama of pancreatic cancer development and progressionHepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International
(2014)
P.A. Jänne et al.Selumetinib plus docetaxel for KRAS-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 2 studyThe Lancet Oncology
(2013)
N. Jonckheere et al.The cornerstone K-RAS mutation in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: From cell signaling network, target genes, biological processes to therapeutic targetingCritical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
(2017)
A. Kapoor et al.Yap1 activation enables bypass of oncogenic kras addiction in pancreatic cancerCell
(2014)
I.M. Ahearn et al.Regulating the regulator: Post-translational modification of RASNature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology
(2011)
T.A. Ahmed et al.SHP2 drives adaptive resistance to ERK signaling inhibition in molecularly defined subsets of ERK-dependent tumorsCell Reports
(2019)
S.A. Ahrendt et al.Cigarette smoking is strongly associated with mutation of the K-ras gene in patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the lungCancer
(2001)
L.G. Ahronian et al.Strategies for monitoring and combating resistance to combination kinase inhibitors for cancer therapyGenome Medicine
(2017)
N.S. Akhave et al.Mechanisms of resistance to KRAS(G12C)-targeted therapy.Cancer Discovery
(2021)
S.J. Allen et al.Chemokine: Receptor structure, interactions, and antagonismAnnual Review of Immunology
(2007)
V. Amodio et al.EGFR blockade reverts resistance to KRAS(G12C) inhibition in colorectal cancer.Cancer Discovery
(2020)
B. Ancrile et al.Oncogenic Ras-induced secretion of IL6 is required for tumorigenesisGenes & Development
(2007)
R.N. Apte et al.The involvement of IL-1 in tumorigenesis, tumor invasiveness, metastasis and tumor-host interactionsCancer and Metastasis Reviews
(2006)
D. Armstrong et al.Lung cancer heterogeneity in modulation of Th17/IL17A responsesFrontiers in Oncology
(2019)
M.M. Awad et al.Acquired resistance to KRAS(G12C) inhibition in cancerThe New England Journal of Medicine
(2021)
M. Awaji et al.CXCR2 signaling promotes secretory cancer-associated fibroblasts in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaThe FASEB Journal
(2020)
S.R. Bailey et al.Th17 cells in cancer: The ultimate identity crisisFrontiers in Immunology
(2014)
D.M. Beaupre et al.Autocrine interleukin-1beta production in leukemia: Evidence for the involvement of mutated RASCancer Research
(1999)
H. Borghaei et al.Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancerThe New England Journal of Medicine
(2015)
H.R. Bourne et al.The GTPase superfamily: Conserved structure and molecular mechanismNature
(1991)
M.E. Bowen et al.SHP2 regulates chondrocyte terminal differentiation, growth plate architecture and skeletal cell fatesPLoS Genetics
(2014)
G.D. Brooks et al.IL6 trans-signaling promotes KRAS-driven lung carcinogenesisCancer Research
(2016)
S. Bunda et al.Inhibition of SHP2-mediated dephosphorylation of Ras suppresses oncogenesisNature Communications
(2015)
L. Buscail et al.Role of oncogenic KRAS in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of pancreatic cancerNature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology
(2020)
M.S. Caetano et al.IL6 blockade reprograms the lung tumor microenvironment to limit the development and progression of K-ras-mutant lung cancerCancer Research
(2016)
J.D. Campbell et al.Distinct patterns of somatic genome alterations in lung adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomasNature Genetics
(2016)
J. Canon et al.The clinical KRAS(G12C) inhibitor AMG 510 drives anti-tumour immunityNature
(2019)
L.C. CantleyThe phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathwayScience (New York, N. Y.)
(2002)
D.A. CantrellGTPases and T cell activationImmunological Reviews
(2003)
C. Castelli et al.Expression of interleukin 1 alpha, interleukin 6, and tumor necrosis factor alpha genes in human melanoma clones is associated with that of mutated N-RAS oncogeneCancer Research
(1994)
S. Ceddia et al.KRAS-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: From past efforts to future challengesInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
(2022)
M. Cefalì et al.Correlation of KRAS G12C mutation and high PD-L1 expression with clinical outcome in NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD1 immunotherapyJournal of Clinical Medicine
(2022)
S.H. Chang et al.T helper 17 cells play a critical pathogenic role in lung cancerProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
(2014)
H. Chen et al.The prevalence and real-world therapeutic analysis of Chinese patients with KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancerCancer Medicine
(2022)
View full textCopyright © 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Comments (0)