The posttranslational regulation of amino acid transporters is critical for their function in the tumor microenvironment

ElsevierVolume 85, February 2024, 103022Current Opinion in BiotechnologyAuthor links open overlay panel,

Amino acid transporters (AATs) facilitate nutrient uptake and nutrient exchange between cancer and stromal cells. The posttranslational modification (PTM) of transporters is an important mechanism that tumor-associated cells use to dynamically regulate their function and stability in response to microenvironmental cues. In this review, we summarize recent findings that demonstrate the significance of N-glycosylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitylation for the function of AATs. We also highlight powerful approaches that hijack the PTM machinery that could be used as therapeutics or tools to modulate transporter activity.

Section snippetsIntroduction: tumor microenvironment and cancer metabolism

The tumor microenvironment (TME) consists of cells, extracellular matrix, nutrients, and ions, and directly regulates the metabolism and activity of tumor-resident cell types. Rewired metabolism is a hallmark of cancer cells that occurs in response to genetic drivers of malignancy and environmental stressors, contributing to the ability of cancer cells to proliferate, survive, and migrate within their local TME [1]. There are specific nutrients in the TME, such as amino acids, that

Solute carriers are regulated by posttranslational modifications

Posttranslational modifications (PTMs), including phosphorylation, glycosylation, and ubiquitylation, are integral for the structure and function of SLCs within their lipid environment and regulate their trafficking, maturation, and turnover.

Approximately two-thirds of annotated SLCs are at least partially localized to the plasma membrane, where they would be expected to interface with nutrients in the TME [15]. Many SLCs are localized to other organelles and may be more important for

Posttranslational modifications affect transporter stability

Identifying modified residues for an AAT of interest is often the first hurdle to studying how PTMs may influence their function. Several tools and databases are readily accessible to predict posttranslationally modified sites, as reviewed in Ref. [26]. Site-directed mutagenesis is frequently used to replace the putatively modified residue with a nonmodifiable amino acid (e.g. serine to alanine, asparagine to glutamine) and validate the functional role of the modification. The alanine, serine,

Chemical inducers of proximity (targeted protein degradation)

There are recent and exciting advancements in developing chemical inducers of proximity (CIPs) that promote protein–protein interactions and induce (or remove) PTMs, as reviewed in Ref. [46]. The ‘dTAG system’ is a model, genetically encoded CIP that facilitates the interaction between target protein fused to a mutant FKBP12F36N domain and the Cereblon E3 ligase to promote the target protein’s ubiquitylation and subsequent proteasomal degradation [47]. Bensimon et al. recently showed that the

Conclusion

Recent discoveries have shown how important PTMs are for regulating the stability, membrane expression, and subcellular distribution of AATs. Directly manipulating these modifications genetically or pharmacologically is a promising strategy to (de)stabilize AATs and affect their activity in cancer cells or other tumor-associated cell types. These tools also show strong potential to help us better understand how AAT activity is regulated by nutrients and other factors present in the complex and

Editorial disclosure statement

Given the role as Guest Editor, Seth Parker had no involvement in the peer review of the article and has no access to information regarding its peer-review. Full responsibility for the editorial process of this article was delegated to Thekla Cordes.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References and recommended reading (54)M. Békés et al.PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue

Nat Rev Drug Discov

(2022)

D. HanahanHallmarks of cancer: new dimensions

Cancer Discov

(2022)

E.L. Lieu et al.Amino acids in cancer

Exp Mol Med

(2020)

W. Palm et al.Nutrient acquisition strategies of mammalian cells

Nature

(2017)

C.M. Sousa et al.Pancreatic stellate cells support tumour metabolism through autophagic alanine secretion

Nature

(2016)

T. Li et al.Methionine deficiency facilitates antitumour immunity by altering m6A methylation of immune checkpoint transcripts

Gut

(2023)

Y. Bian et al.Cancer SLC43A2 alters T cell methionine metabolism and histone methylation

Nature

(2020)

D.N. Edwards et al.Selective glutamine metabolism inhibition in tumor cells improves antitumor T lymphocyte activity in triple-negative breast cancer

J Clin Investig

(2021)

Z.C. Nwosu et al.Nutrient transporters: connecting cancer metabolism to therapeutic opportunities

Oncogene

(2023)

G. Gauthier-Coles et al.Quantitative modelling of amino acid transport and homeostasis in mammalian cells

Nat Commun

(2021)

M. Nachef et al.Targeting SLC1A5 and SLC3A2/SLC7A5 as a potential strategy to strengthen anti-tumor immunity in the tumor microenvironment

Front Immunol

(2021)

K. Pakos-Zebrucka et al.The integrated stress response

EMBO Rep

(2016)

E. Meixner et al.A substrate-based ontology for human solute carriers

Mol Syst Biol

(2020)

C.D. Go et al.A proximity-dependent biotinylation map of a human cell

Nature

(2022)

P.P. Chothe et al.Tyrosine phosphorylation regulates plasma membrane expression and stability of the human bile acid transporter ASBT (SLC10A2)

Mol Pharm

(2019)

N. Foot et al.Ubiquitination and the regulation of membrane proteins

Physiol Rev

(2017)

S.J. Qualls-Histed et al.Lysosomal trafficking of the glucose transporter GLUT1 requires sequential regulation by TXNIP and ubiquitin

iScience

(2023)

View full text

© 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Comments (0)

No login
gif